Cited by 20Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Night shift work and stomach cancer risk in the MCC-Spain study

Open access
Gyarmati, Georgina, Turner, Michelle C, Castaño-Vinyals, Gemma, Espinosa, Ana, Papantoniou, Kyriaki, Alguacil, Juan, Costas, Laura, Pérez-Gómez, Beatriz +12 more·2016·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Night shift work has been classified as a probable human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, based on experimental studies and limited evidence on human breast cancer risk. Evidence at other cancer sites is scarce. We evaluated the association between night shift work and stomach cancer risk in a population-based case-control study. METHODS: A total of 374 incident stomach adenocarcinoma cases and 2481 population controls were included from the MCC-Spain study. Detailed data on lifetime night shift work were collected including permanent and rotating shifts, and their cumulative duration (years). Adjusted unconditional logistic regression models were used in analysis. RESULTS: A total of 25.7% of cases and 22.5% of controls reported ever being a night shift worker. There was a weak positive, non-significant association between ever having had worked for at least 1 year in permanent night shifts and stomach cancer risk compared to never having worked night shifts (OR=1.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.8). However, there was an inverse 'U' shaped relationship with cumulative duration of permanent night shifts, with the highest risk observed in the intermediate duration category (OR 10-20 years=2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.6) (p for trend=0.19). There was no association with ever having had worked in rotating night shifts (OR=0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2) and no trend according to cumulative duration (p for trend=0.68). CONCLUSION: We found no clear evidence concerning an association between night shift work and stomach cancer risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oemed-2016-103597

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many human health effects are linked to misalignment of chronotype, including cancer, obesity, and diabetes.

    “Many human health effects are linked to the misalignment of chronotype (Knutson and von Schantz 2018), including cancer, obesity (Gyarmati et al. 2016; Papantoniou et al. 2016, 2017; Gan et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2020; Yousef et al. 2020), and diabetes (Gan et al. 2015; Larcher et al. 2015, 2016).”

    From Archaic Introgression Shaped Human Circadian Traits (2023) · cites this paper as Gyarmati et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Archaic Introgression Shaped Human Circadian Traits

    Velazquez-Arcelay, K., Colbran, L. L., McArthur, E., Brand, C. M., Rinker, D. C., Siemann, J. K., McMahon, D. G., & Capra, J. A. (2023) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evad203 · Cited by 18 · see citing works

    “Many human health effects are linked to the misalignment of chronotype (Knutson and von Schantz 2018), including cancer, obesity (Gyarmati et al. 2016; Papantoniou et al. 2016, 2017; Gan et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2020; Yousef et al. 2020), and diabetes (Gan et al. 2015; Larcher et al. 2015, 2016).”
    Background

Authors
Gyarmati, G., Turner, M. C., Castaño-Vinyals, G., Espinosa, A., Papantoniou, K., Alguacil, J., Costas, L., Pérez-Gómez, B., Martin Sanchez, V., Ardanaz, E., Moreno, V., Gómez-Acebo, I., Fernández-Tardon, G., Villanueva Ballester, V., Capelo, R., Chirlaque, M.-D., Santibáñez, M., Pollán, M., Aragonés, N., & Kogevinas, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (ES)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
  • Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES)
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Corresponding author
Turner, Michelle C
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-06-16
Volume
73
Issue
8
Pages
520-527
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
OpenAlex
W2440586806
Cited by
20
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UCrea (University of Cantabria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
night shift work, gastric cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, rotating shifts, cancer risk, occupational carcinogens, IARC classification
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Risk Factors, Spain, Stomach Neoplasms, Work Schedule Tolerance, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review