Cited by 23Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

Syndromes of orthostatic intolerance and syncope in young adults

Open access
Hamrefors, Viktor, Spahic, Jasmina Medic, Nilsson, David, Senneby, Martin, Sutton, Richard, Melander, Olle, Fedorowski, Artur·2017·Open Heart

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical and neuroendocrine characteristics of syndromes of orthostatic intolerance and syncope in young adults. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-six patients aged 18–40 years with orthostatic intolerance and/or syncope were examined by head-up tilt test (HUT). Plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, renin, C-terminal-pro-arginine-vasopressin (CT-proAVP), C-terminal-endothelin-1 and mid-regional-fragment of pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) were analysed. Patients’ history, haemodynamic parameters and plasma biomarkers were related to main diagnoses such as vasovagal syncope (VVS), postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), orthostatic hypotension (OH) and negative HUT. Results: No self-reported symptom of orthostatic intolerance was highly specific for any diagnosis. Patients with VVS (n=103) were more likely to be men (p=0.011) and had lower resting heart rate (HR; 66±11) compared with POTS (73±11; n=72; p=0.001) and negative HUT (74±11; n=39; p=0.001). Patients with POTS demonstrated greater rise in norepinephrine (p=0.008) and CT-proAVP (p=0.033) on standing compared with negative HUT, and lower resting MR-proANP compared with VVS (p=0.04) and OH (p=0.03). Patients with OH had lower resting renin (p=0.03). Subjects with a resting HR <70 and MR-proANP >45 pm/L had an OR of 3.99 (95 % CI 1.68 to 9.52; p=0.002) for VVS compared with subjects without any of these criteria; if male sex was added the OR was 21.8 (95% CI 3.99 to 119; p<0.001). Conclusions: Syndromes of orthostatic intolerance and syncope share many characteristics in younger persons. However, patients with VVS are more likely to be men, have lower HR and higher MR-proANP at rest compared with POTS, which might be taken into account at an early stage of evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000585

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a specialized syncope unit, nearly one-third of patients aged 18-40 with unexplained syncope and pronounced orthostatic intolerance may satisfy POTS diagnostic criteria.

    “In a specialized syncope unit, almost one-third of patients aged 18-40 years with a history of unexplained syncope and pronounced orthostatic intolerance may meet the diagnostic POTS criteria [22].”
  • Orthostatic intolerance symptoms and syncopal event counts do not reliably separate POTS from other syncope-related dysautonomic conditions, orthostatic hypotension, or recurrent vasovagal syncope.

    “Importantly, symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and number of syncopal events do not well discriminate between POTS and other syncope-related dysautonomic conditions, orthostatic hypotension and recurrent vasovagal syncope [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamrefors, V., Spahic, J. M., Nilsson, D., Senneby, M., Sutton, R., Melander, O., & Fedorowski, A.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hamrefors, Viktor
Venue
Open Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-05
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e000585
ISSN
2053-3624 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614254939
Cited by
23
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Open Heart (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • The Albert Phlsson Research Foundation
  • Skne University Hospital
  • The Medical Faculty of Lund University
  • The Ernhold Lundstrms Research Foundation
  • The Crafoord Foundation
  • The Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  • Swedish Medical Research Council
  • European Research Council
  • The King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria Foundation
  • The Wallenberg Foundation
  • ALF-funds
  • The Region Skne
  • The Hulda and Conrad Mossfelt Foundation
  • The Lennart Hanssons Memorial Foundation
  • The Anna Lisa and Sven-Erik Lundgrens Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
orthostatic intolerance, syncope, vasovagal syncope, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, orthostatic hypotension, head-up tilt, neuroendocrine markers, norepinephrine, vasopressin, MR-proANP, endothelin-1, renin, heart rate, young adults, diagnostic criteria, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review