Cited by 271Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Carvedilol alone or in combination with digoxin for the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure?

Open access
Khand, Aleem U, Rankin, Andrew C, Martin, William, Taylor, Jacqueline, Gemmell, Islay, Cleland, John G.F·2003·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study examined the relative merits of digoxin, carvedilol, and their combination for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF).Background In patients with AF and HF, both digoxin and beta-blockers reduce the ventricular rate, and both may improve symptoms, but only beta-blockers have been shown to improve prognosis. If combined therapy is not superior to beta-blockers alone, treatment of patients with HF and AF could be simplified by stopping digoxin.Methods We enrolled 47 patients (29 males; mean age 68 years) with persistent AF and HF (mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 24%) in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. In the first phase of the study, digoxin was compared with the combination of digoxin and carvedilol (four months). In the second phase, digoxin was withdrawn in a double-blinded manner in the carvedilol-treated arm, thus allowing a comparison between digoxin and carvedilol (six months). Investigations were undertaken at baseline and at the end of each phase.Results Compared with digoxin alone, combination therapy lowered the ventricular rate on 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (p < 0.0001) and during submaximal exercise (p < 0.05), whereas LVEF (p < 0.05) and symptom score (p < 0.05) improved. In phase 2, there was no significant difference between digoxin alone and carvedilol alone in any variable. The mean ventricular rate rose and LVEF fell when patients switched from combination therapy to carvedilol alone. Six-minute walk distance was not significantly influenced by any therapy.Conclusions The combination of carvedilol and digoxin appears generally superior to either carvedilol or digoxin alone in the management of AF in patients with HF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.020

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparisons with other rate control therapies are based on small, short-duration studies that identify no or marginal differences in exercise capacity, quality of life, or LVEF compared to digoxin.

    “Comparisons with other rate control therapies are based on small, short-duration studies that identify no or marginal differences in exercise capacity, quality of life, or LVEF compared to digoxin.526,[554][555][556][557][558]”
  • In a crossover mechanistic trial of 47 patients with HFrEF and AF, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure, walking distance, or LVEF between carvedilol and digoxin.

    “In a crossover mechanistic trial of 47 patients with HFrEF and AF, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure, walking distance, or LVEF between carvedilol and digoxin, although beta-blockers did result in higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels, combination carvedilol/digoxin improved LVEF, and digoxin withdrawal reduced LVEF.554”
  • In the same trial, beta-blockers resulted in higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels.

    “In a crossover mechanistic trial of 47 patients with HFrEF and AF, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure, walking distance, or LVEF between carvedilol and digoxin, although beta-blockers did result in higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels, combination carvedilol/digoxin improved LVEF, and digoxin withdrawal reduced LVEF.554”
  • In the same trial, combination carvedilol/digoxin improved LVEF.

    “In a crossover mechanistic trial of 47 patients with HFrEF and AF, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure, walking distance, or LVEF between carvedilol and digoxin, although beta-blockers did result in higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels, combination carvedilol/digoxin improved LVEF, and digoxin withdrawal reduced LVEF.554”
  • In the same trial, digoxin withdrawal reduced LVEF.

    “In a crossover mechanistic trial of 47 patients with HFrEF and AF, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure, walking distance, or LVEF between carvedilol and digoxin, although beta-blockers did result in higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels, combination carvedilol/digoxin improved LVEF, and digoxin withdrawal reduced LVEF.554”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kudoh M. Clinical studies on long-term combined therapy of digitalis and xamoterol for patients with mild and moderate congestive heart failure accompanied by atrial fibrillation. Tokyo Med J 1988;16:65-74.
  2. Goldstein RE, Boccuzzi SJ, Cruess D. Diltiazem increases late-onset congestive heart failure in postinfarction patients with early reduction in ejection fraction. Circulation 1991;83:52-60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khand, A. U., Rankin, A. C., Martin, W., Taylor, J., Gemmell, I., & Cleland, J. G. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Cleland, John G.F
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
1944-1951
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138396513
Cited by
271
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
carvedilol, digoxin, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, combination therapy, beta-blockers, ventricular rate control, left ventricular ejection fraction, symptom scores
MeSH terms
Cyclohexane Monoterpenes, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Digoxin, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Exercise Test, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Monoterpenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review