The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity
Open accessAbstract
Objectives:To quantify the implementation of tobacco control policies at country level using a new Tobacco Control Scale and to report initial results using the scale. Method:A questionnaire sent to correspondents in 30 European countries, using a scoring system designed with the help of a panel of international tobacco control experts. Results:The 30 countries are ranked by their total score on the scale out of a maximum possible score of 100. Only four countries (Ireland, United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland) scored 70 or more, with an eight point gap (most differences in scores are small) to the fifth country, Malta, on 62. Only 13 countries scored above 50, 11 of them from the European Union (EU), and the second largest points gap occurs between Denmark on 45 and Portugal on 39, splitting the table into three groups: 70 and above, 45 to 62, 39 and below. Ireland had the highest overall score, 74 out of 100, and Luxembourg was bottom with 26 points. However even Ireland, much praised for their ban on smoking in public places, did not increase tobacco taxes in 2005, for the first time since 1995. Conclusions:Although the Tobacco Control Scale has limitations, this is the first time such a scale has been developed and applied to so many countries. We hope it will be useful in encouraging countries to strengthen currently weak areas of their tobacco control policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review
Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188 · Cited by 1,072
Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden
Foulds, J., Ramstrom, L., Burke, M., & Fagerström, K. (2003) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.12.4.349 · Cited by 471
A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Smoke-Free Worksite Policies on Tobacco Use
Bauer, J. E., Hyland, A., Li, Q., Steger, C., & Cummings, K. M. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.048678 · Cited by 230
Willemsen, M. C. (2005) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki061 · Cited by 78
Cited by
The Tobacco Control Scale 2025 in Europe
Joossens, L., Abbink, H. H. B., & Roman, E. (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20849410 · Cited by 425
Self-citationHill, S., Amos, A., Clifford, D., & Platt, S. (2014) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110 · Cited by 398
Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place
Henriksen, L. (2012) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050416 · Cited by 312
'The smoking toolkit study': a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England
Fidler, J. A., Shahab, L., West, O., Jarvis, M. J., McEwen, A., Stapleton, J. A., Vangeli, E., & West, R. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-479 · Cited by 311
Chow, C. K., Lock, K., Teo, K., Subramanian, S., McKee, M., & Yusuf, S. (2009) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyn258 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Joossens, L., & Raw, M.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-05-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-253
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2129989063
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2005.015347
- The paper
- Joossens, L., & Raw, M. (2006). The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.015347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.