Cited by 78Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyBehavioral Health and Interventions

The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits

Open access
Willemsen, Marc C.·2005·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As of September 2004, all European Union countries are required to have new health warnings on cigarette packs. This study examined the self-perceived impact of these warnings on the attractiveness of cigarettes, smokers' motivation to quit and smoking behaviour. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study comprising 3937 Dutch adult smokers. RESULTS: Of smokers, 14% became less inclined to purchase cigarettes because of the new warnings, 31.8% said they prefer to purchase a pack without the new warnings, 17.9% reported that warnings increased their motivated to quit and 10.3% said they smoked less. A strong dose-response relationship was observed between these effects and intention to quit. CONCLUSIONS: The new warnings made cigarette packs less attractive, especially to smokers who already intended to stop smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/cki061

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zatonski W, Prezewozniack K, Porebski M. The impact of enlarged pack health warnings on smoking behaviour and attitudes in Poland. Proceedings of the Second European conference on Tobacco or Health, 24-26 February 1999, Las Palmas, Spain Las Palmas: Uitgever, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willemsen, M. C.
Corresponding author
Willemsen, Marc C.
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2005-06-23
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
389-392
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2135432523
Cited by
78
References
6
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
cigarette health warnings, smoking cessation intentions, smoking behavior, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, European Union, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Netherlands, Product Labeling, Smoking, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review