Cited by 84Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersMedical Practices and RehabilitationRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Effectiveness of an exercise programme on physical function in patients discharged from hospital following critical illness: A randomised controlled trial (the REVIVE trial).

Open access
McDowell, Kathryn, O'Neill, Brenda, Blackwood, Bronagh, Clarke, Chris, Gardner, Evie, Johnston, Paul, Kelly, Michaeline, McCaffrey, John +6 more·2017·Thorax

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a 6-week exercise programme in patients discharged home following critical illness compared with standard care. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective phase II randomised controlled trial, with blinded outcome assessment after hospital discharge, following the 6-week intervention and at 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: 60 patients (30 per group) aged ≥18 years, mechanically ventilated >96 hours, and not in other rehabilitation, that is, cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Participants in the intervention group completed an individually tailored (personalised) exercise programme. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was SF-36 physical functioning following the intervention. Secondary outcomes included a range of performance-based and patient-reported measures. RESULTS: Improvements in the primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups (mean difference (95% CI) 3.0 (-2.2 to 8.2), p=0.26). The intervention group showed significant improvement compared with the control group (mean difference (95% CI)) in SF-36 role physical (6.6 (0.73 to 12.5), p=0.03); incremental shuttle walk test (83.1 m (8.3 to 157.9), p=0.03); functional limitations profile (-4.8 (-8.7 to -0.9), p=0.02); self-efficacy to exercise (2.2 (0.8 to 3.7), p=0.01) and readiness to exercise (1.3 (0.8 to 1.9), p<0.001). These improvements were not sustained at 6 months except readiness to exercise. Improvements in all other secondary outcome measures were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure of self-reported physical function following this 6-week exercise programme. Secondary outcome results will help inform future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01463579. (results), https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208723

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Critical care on July 20, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208723 on 15 November 2016. Downloaded from REFERENCES

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDowell, K., O'Neill, B., Blackwood, B., Clarke, C., Gardner, E., Johnston, P., Kelly, M., McCaffrey, J., Mullan, B., Murphy, S., Trinder, T. J., Lavery, G., McAuley, D. F., & Bradley, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Craigavon Area Hospital (GB)
  • Antrim Area Hospital (GB)
  • Altnagelvin Area Hospital (GB)
  • Belfast City Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Victoria Hospital (GB)
  • Ulster Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
O'Neill, Brenda
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
594.1-595
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2556581150
Cited by
84
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
exercise programmes, physical function, critical illness, post-intensive care syndrome, hospital discharge, mechanical ventilation, SF-36, incremental shuttle walk test, functional limitations, self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Walk Test, Adult, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Exercise, Single-Blind Method, Critical Illness, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review