Cited by 170Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Effects of post-ICU follow-up on subject outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rosa, Regis Goulart, Ferreira, Giovanni Esteves, Viola, Thiago Wendt, Robinson, Caroline Cabral, Kochhann, Renata, Berto, Paula Pinheiro, Biason, Livia, Cardoso, Paulo Ricardo +2 more·2019·Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize data on subject outcomes associated with post-ICU follow-up.Materials and methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched according to pre-specified criteria (PROSPERO- CRD42017074734). Non-randomized and randomized studies assessing patient and family outcomes associated with post-ICU follow-up were included.Results Twenty-six studies were included. Sixteen (61%) were randomized trials; of these, 15 were meta-analyzed. Non-randomized studies reported benefits in survival, functional status, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and satisfaction. In randomized trials, post-ICU follow-up models focusing on physical therapy were associated with fewer depression symptoms (mean difference [MD], -1.21 (see Fig. 2); 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.31 to -0.11; I 2 = 0%) and better mental health-related quality of life scores (standardized MD [SMD], 0.26; 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.51; I 2 = 6%) in the short term. Post-ICU follow-up models focusing on psychological or medical management interventions were associated with fewer PTSD symptoms (SMD, -0.21; 95%CI, -0.37 to -0.05; I 2 = 0%) in the medium term.Conclusions Post-ICU follow-up may improve depression symptoms and mental health-related quality of life in the short term for models focusing on physical therapy and PTSD symptoms in the medium term for models focusing on psychological or medical management interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.014

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosa, R. G., Ferreira, G. E., Viola, T. W., Robinson, C. C., Kochhann, R., Berto, P. P., Biason, L., Cardoso, P. R., Falavigna, M., & Teixeira, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
  • Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR)
Venue
Journal of Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
52
Pages
115-125
ISSN
0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940064345
Cited by
170
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Brazilian Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
post-ICU follow-up, intensive care unit survivors, physiotherapy, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, mental health-related quality of life, anxiety, family outcomes, patient outcomes, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Clinical Trials as Topic, Critical Care, Depression, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Patient Discharge, Quality of Life, Risk, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review