Cited by 92Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Effect of supervised aerobic exercise rehabilitation on physical fitness and quality-of-life in survivors of critical illness: an exploratory minimized controlled trial (PIX study)

Open access
Batterham, A.M., Bonner, S., Wright, J., Howell, S.J., Hugill, K., Danjoux, G.·2014·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited for the effectiveness of interventions for survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge. We explored the effect of an 8-week hospital-based exercise-training programme on physical fitness and quality-of-life. METHODS: In a parallel-group minimized controlled trial, patients were recruited before hospital discharge or in the intensive care follow-up clinic and enrolled 8-16 weeks after discharge. Each week, the intervention comprised two sessions of physiotherapist-led cycle ergometer exercise (30 min, moderate intensity) plus one equivalent unsupervised exercise session. The control group received usual care. The primary outcomes were the anaerobic threshold (in ml O2 kg(-1) min(-1)) and physical function and mental health (SF-36 questionnaire v.2), measured at Weeks 9 (primary time point) and 26. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Thirty patients were allocated to the control and 29 to the intervention. For the anaerobic threshold outcome at Week 9, data were available for 17 control vs 13 intervention participants. There was a small benefit (vs control) for the anaerobic threshold of 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.4-3.2) ml O2 kg(-1) min(-1). This advantage was not sustained at Week 26. There was evidence for a possible beneficial effect of the intervention on self-reported physical function at Week 9 (3.4; -1.4 to 8.2 units) and on mental health at Week 26 (4.4; -2.4 to 11.2 units). These potential benefits should be examined robustly in any subsequent definitive trial. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention appeared to accelerate the natural recovery process and seems feasible, but the fitness benefit was only short term. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN65176374 (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN65176374).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bja/aeu051

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four observational studies examined the impact of peer support groups on ICU patients, though they were not specific to sepsis patients.

    “Four observational studies examined the impact of peer support groups on ICU patients, though they were not specific to sepsis patients.”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [554]

    The Methods (Participants and sample size; page unavailable) describe an exploratory trial of ICU survivors admitted for trauma or sepsis, not an observational study of peer support groups. The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies the intervention as exercise. Our copy does not report four observational studies of peer support groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several randomised studies have assessed physical rehabilitation programmes for survivors of critical illness.

    “Several randomised studies have assessed physical rehabilitation programmes for survivors of critical illness [581, 606, 644–651].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batterham, A. M., Bonner, S., Wright, J., Howell, S. J., Hugill, K., & Danjoux, G.
Affiliations
  • Teesside University (GB)
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Danjoux, G.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
130-137
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120267076
Cited by
92
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0407-13274, PB-PG-1111-26068)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K02325X/1)
  • Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
critical illness survivors, post-intensive care syndrome, exercise rehabilitation, physical fitness, quality of life, anaerobic threshold, physical function, mental health, cycle ergometry, physiotherapy, hospital discharge
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Anaerobic Threshold, Single-Blind Method, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review