Cited by 250Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersMedical Practices and RehabilitationRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Health-related quality of life and physical recovery after a critical illness: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical rehabilitation program

Open access
Elliott, Doug, McKinley, Sharon, Alison, Jennifer, Aitken, Leanne M, King, Madeleine, Leslie, Gavin D, Kenny, Patricia, Taylor, Penny +2 more·2011·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: Significant physical sequelae exist for some survivors of a critical illness. There are, however, few studies that have examined specific interventions to improve their recovery, and none have tested a home-based physical rehabilitation program incorporating trainer visits to participants' homes. This study was designed to test the effect of an individualised eight-week home-based physical rehabilitation program on recovery. Methods: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial design was used. Adult intensive care patients (length of stay of at least 48 hours and mechanically ventilated for 24 hours or more) were recruited from 12 Australian hospitals between 2005 and 2008. Graded, individualised endurance and strength training intervention was prescribed over eight weeks, with three physical trainer home visits, four follow-up phone calls, and supported by a printed exercise manual. The main outcome measures were blinded assessments of physical function; SF-36 physical function (PF) scale and six-minute walk test (6MWT), and health-related quality of life (SF-36) conducted at 1, 8 and 26 weeks after hospital discharge. Results: Of the 195 participants randomised, 183, 173 and 161 completed the 1, 8 and 26 weeks assessments, respectively. Study groups were similar at Week 1 post-hospital; for the intervention and control groups respectively, mean norm-based PF scores were 27 and 29 and the 6MWT distance was 291 and 324 metres. Both groups experienced significant and clinically important improvements in PF scores and 6MWT distance at 8 weeks, which persisted at 26 weeks. Mixed model analysis showed no significant group effects ( P = 0.84) or group by time interactions ( P = 0.68) for PF. Similar results were found for 6MWT and the SF-36 summary scores. Conclusions: This individualised eight-week home-based physical rehabilitation program did not increase the underlying rate of recovery in this sample, with both groups of critically ill survivors improving their physical function over the 26 weeks of follow-up. Further research should explore improving effectiveness of the intervention by increasing exercise intensity and frequency, and identifying individuals who would benefit most from this intervention. Trial registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12605000166673

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc10265

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses report a higher incidence of hypoglycemia (glucose < 40 mg/dL) in critically ill patients when blood glucose was targeted to 80-110 mg/dL.

    “Meta-analyses also report a higher incidence of hypoglycemia (glucose < 40 mg/dL) in critically patients where blood glucose was targeted to 80-110 mg/dL (516, 517).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [516]

    The Materials and methods section describes eligibility for a home-based rehabilitation trial, and the Results report physical-recovery and quality-of-life outcomes; no page numbers are available in our copy. Searches for hypoglycemia, glucose targets, intensive insulin therapy, and glycemic control found no passage addressing the claimed meta-analysis finding. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several randomised studies have assessed physical rehabilitation programmes for survivors of critical illness.

    “Several randomised studies have assessed physical rehabilitation programmes for survivors of critical illness [581, 606, 644–651].”
  • Several studies, mostly before-and-after design, have examined critical care transition programmes on reducing ICU readmission or death among patients transferred from ICU to ward.

    “Several studies, mostly before-and-after design, have examined the impact of critical care transition programmes on reducing ICU readmission or death among patients transferred from ICU to the ward [597, 601, 603–611].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Drennan K Hicks P Hart GK Intensive Care Resources & Activity: Australia and New Zealand 2007/2008 2010 Melbourne: Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society 20191791

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, D., McKinley, S., Alison, J., Aitken, L. M., King, M., Leslie, G. D., Kenny, P., Taylor, P., Foley, R., & Burmeister, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Elliott, Doug
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2011-06-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
R142-R142
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111597613
Cited by
250
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (352407)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
critical illness, health-related quality of life, physical function recovery, intensive care unit survivors, endurance training, resistance training, 6-minute walk test, SF-36, post-discharge recovery, mechanical ventilation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Critical Illness, Recovery of Function, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review