Cited by 207Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

E-cigarette use as a predictor of cigarette smoking: results from a 1-year follow-up of a national sample of 12th grade students

Open access
Miech, Richard, Patrick, Megan E, O'Malley, Patrick M, Johnston, Lloyd D·2017·Tobacco Control

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine vaping as a predictor of future cigarette smoking among youth with and without previous cigarette smoking experience. A secondary aim is to investigate whether vaping may desensitise youth to the dangers of smoking. METHODS: Analysis of prospective longitudinal panel data from the nationally representative Monitoring the Future study. The analysis is based on 347 12th grade students who were part of a randomly selected subsample that completed in-school surveys in 2014 and were resurveyed 1-year later. RESULTS: Among youth who had never smoked a cigarette by 12th grade, baseline, recent vapers were more than 4 times (relative risk (RR)=4.78) more likely to report past-year cigarette smoking at follow-up, even among youth who reported the highest possible level of perceived risk for cigarette smoking at baseline. Among 12th grade students who had smoked in the past but had not recently smoked at baseline, recent vapers were twice (RR=2.15) as likely to report smoking in the past 12 months at the follow-up. Vaping did not predict cessation of smoking among recent smokers at baseline. Among never-smokers at baseline, recent vapers were more than 4 times (RR=4.73) more likely to move away from the perception of cigarettes as posing a 'great risk' of harm, a finding consistent with a desensitisation process. CONCLUSIONS: These results contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting vaping as a one-way bridge to cigarette smoking among youth. Vaping as a risk factor for future smoking is a strong, scientifically-based rationale for restricting youth access to e-cigarettes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053291

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E-cigarettes were introduced to the US market in 2007 and are now the most commonly used tobacco product among teenagers.

    “Although introduced as recently as 2007 to the US market, e-cigarettes are now the most commonly used tobacco product among teenagers (Miech et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019).”

    From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Miech et al., 2017

    The Introduction reports rapid growth in e-cigarette use among U.S. students, and the Results say recent vaping was about 50% more prevalent than recent cigarette smoking in the study sample. Neither passage establishes that e-cigarettes were introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 or that they were the most commonly used tobacco product among teenagers overall. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miech, R., Patrick, M. E., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Miech, Richard
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
26
Issue
e2
Pages
e106-e111
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2587355417
Cited by
207
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22
FWCI
25.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 001411, DA 016575)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
vaping, cigarette smoking, adolescent smoking initiation, never smokers, smoking cessation, high school students
MeSH terms
Vaping, Cigarette Smoking, Adolescent, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Students, Smoking Cessation, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review