Cited by 1,170Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Association Between Initial Use of e-Cigarettes and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Soneji, Samir, Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L., Wills, Thomas A., Leventhal, Adam M., Unger, Jennifer B., Gibson, Laura A., Yang, JaeWon, Primack, Brian A. +8 more·2017·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

Importance: The public health implications of e-cigarettes depend, in part, on whether e-cigarette use affects the risk of cigarette smoking. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies that assessed initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the 2016 Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 22nd Annual Meeting abstracts, the 2016 Society of Behavioral Medicine 37th Annual Meeting & Scientific Sessions abstracts, and the 2016 National Institutes of Health Tobacco Regulatory Science Program Conference were searched between February 7 and February 17, 2017. The search included indexed terms and text words to capture concepts associated with e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes in articles published from database inception to the date of the search. Study Selection: Longitudinal studies reporting odds ratios for cigarette smoking initiation associated with ever use of e-cigarettes or past 30-day cigarette smoking associated with past 30-day e-cigarette use. Searches yielded 6959 unique studies, of which 9 met inclusion criteria (comprising 17 389 adolescents and young adults). Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool, respectively. Data and estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Among baseline never cigarette smokers, cigarette smoking initiation between baseline and follow-up. Among baseline non-past 30-day cigarette smokers who were past 30-day e-cigarette users, past 30-day cigarette smoking at follow-up. Results: Among 17 389 adolescents and young adults, the ages ranged between 14 and 30 years at baseline, and 56.0% were female. The pooled probabilities of cigarette smoking initiation were 30.4% for baseline ever e-cigarette users and 7.9% for baseline never e-cigarette users. The pooled probabilities of past 30-day cigarette smoking at follow-up were 21.5% for baseline past 30-day e-cigarette users and 4.6% for baseline non-past 30-day e-cigarette users. Adjusting for known demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral risk factors for cigarette smoking, the pooled odds ratio for subsequent cigarette smoking initiation was 3.62 (95% CI, 2.42-5.41) for ever vs never e-cigarette users, and the pooled odds ratio for past 30-day cigarette smoking at follow-up was 4.28 (95% CI, 2.52-7.27) for past 30-day e-cigarette vs non-past 30-day e-cigarette users at baseline. A moderate level of heterogeneity was observed among studies (I2 = 60.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: e-Cigarette use was associated with greater risk for subsequent cigarette smoking initiation and past 30-day cigarette smoking. Strong e-cigarette regulation could potentially curb use among youth and possibly limit the future population-level burden of cigarette smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1488

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teen e-cigarette use is associated with higher risk of later starting and continuing cigarette smoking.

    “teen e-cigarette use is associated with greater risk for subsequent initiation and continuation of cigarette smoking”

    From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Soneji et al, 2017

    The Abstract Results and Conclusions report an association between e-cigarette use and later cigarette-smoking initiation and past-30-day cigarette smoking. But the Methods (Statistical Analysis) specify that the later-smoking analysis involved people who were not current cigarette smokers at baseline; it does not establish that e-cigarette use was associated with continuing to smoke cigarettes among existing smokers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It is possible that e-cigarettes may result in greater cigarette initiation in adolescence than would otherwise be expected.

    “it is possible that e-cigarettes may result in greater cigarette initiation in adolescence than would otherwise be expected”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soneji, S., Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Wills, T. A., Leventhal, A. M., Unger, J. B., Gibson, L. A., Yang, J., Primack, B. A., Andrews, J. A., Miech, R. A., Spindle, T. R., Dick, D. M., Eissenberg, T., Hornik, R. C., Dang, R., & Sargent, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US)
  • Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • currently a medical student at Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Soneji, Samir
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
171
Issue
8
Pages
788
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W2698106459
Cited by
1,170
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 193 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 24
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA179546, R01CA153154, P50CA180905, P30CA023108)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007584)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, cigarette smoking initiation, adolescents, young adults, vaping
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Disease Progression, Young Adult, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review