Cited by 92Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Exploring the gateway hypothesis of e-cigarettes and tobacco: a prospective replication study among adolescents in the Netherlands and Flanders

Open access
Martinelli, Thomas, Candel, Math J J M, de Vries, Hein, Talhout, Reinskje, Knapen, Vera, van Schayck, Constant P, Nagelhout, Gera E·2023·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Background: Studies demonstrated that adolescent e-cigarette use is associated with subsequent tobacco smoking, commonly referred to as the gateway effect . However, most studies only investigated gateways from e-cigarettes to tobacco smoking. This study replicates a cornerstone study revealing a positive association between both adolescent e-cigarette use and subsequent tobacco use; and tobacco and subsequent e-cigarette use in the Netherlands and Flanders. Design: The longitudinal design included baseline (n=2839) and 6-month (n=1276) and 12-month (n=1025) follow-up surveys among a school-based cohort (mean age: 13.62). Ten high schools were recruited as a convenience sample. The analyses involved (1) associations of baseline e-cigarette use and subsequent tobacco smoking among never smokers; (2) associations of e-cigarette use frequency at baseline and tobacco smoking frequency at follow-up; and (3) the association of baseline tobacco smoking and subsequent e-cigarette use among non-users of e-cigarettes. Findings: Consistent with prior findings, baseline e-cigarette use was associated with higher odds of tobacco smoking at 6-month (OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.05 to 3.37) and 12-month (OR=5.63; 95% CI 3.04 to 10.42) follow-ups. More frequent use of e-cigarettes at baseline was associated with more frequent smoking at follow-ups. Baseline tobacco smoking was associated with subsequent e-cigarette use (OR=3.10; 95% CI 1.58 to 6.06 at both follow-ups). Conclusion: Our study replicated the positive relation between e-cigarette use and tobacco smoking in both directions for adolescents. This may mean that the gateway works in two directions, that e-cigarette and tobacco use share common risk factors, or that both mechanisms apply.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056528

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More adolescents are inclined to transition from vaping to conventional cigarettes, reversing a two-decade-long decline.

    “Moreover, more adolescents are inclined to transition from vaping to conventional cigarettes, reversing a two-decade-long decline [166–169].”

    From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [168]

    The Results and Discussion report that adolescents who had used e-cigarettes were more likely to start smoking combustible cigarettes than those who had not. The paper does not establish that this transition reversed a two-decade decline; its Introduction instead says adolescent tobacco use decreased during the last decade as e-cigarette use increased. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinelli, T., Candel, M. J. J. M., de Vries, H., Talhout, R., Knapen, V., van Schayck, C. P., & Nagelhout, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Corresponding author
Martinelli, Thomas
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
170-178
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W3178295146
Cited by
92
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NWO (401.16.012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
gateway hypothesis, electronic cigarettes, smoking, adolescents, vaping, tobacco use, replication study, dual use, smoking initiation
MeSH terms
Vaping, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Nicotiana, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review