Cited by 14Dermatological diseases and infestationsYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchHelminth infection and control

Evaluation of flea control programmes for cats using fenthion and lufenuron

Fisher, M. A., Jacobs, D. E., Hutchinson, M. J., Dick, I. G. C.·1996·Veterinary Record

Abstract

Four groups of six cats were kept in carpeted pens similarly infected with Ctenocephalides felis . One group was left untreated, but the other groups were treated every 28th day with either an insecticide (fenthion at 30 mg); or an inhibitor of insect development (lufenuron at 133 or 266 mg) or with both. A sudden upsurge in the numbers of fleas occurred on the control cats after 50 days. At this time, the three control strategies had reduced the counts by 91.3, 72.5 and 98.6 per cent, respectively. Thereafter, welfare considerations demanded the limitation of the flea burden on the control cats, but conditions were shown to be favourable for flea development throughout the study. The mean numbers of fleas on the treated groups after six months were 1.2, 11.0 and 0.4, respectively. After this, in addition to the fleas acquired in the pen, the cats were each infected weekly with five fleas to mimic roaming animals introducing extraneous fleas into the home. This produced no obvious effect on the counts and the mean values three months later were 0.5, 11.0 and 0.2, respectively. None of the strategies eradicated the flea population but they all reduced the numbers considerably and worked equally well whether or not small numbers of new fleas were introduced into the system. Significantly lower flea counts were maintained in the early and later stages of the study by the strategies including the insecticide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/vr.138.4.79

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control and prevention of flea infections rely on strategic treatments with persistent adulticidal products and/or with chemicals acting against off-host immature stages along with adulticides, if an infestation already pre-exists.

    “Control and prevention of flea infections rely on strategic treatments with persistent adulticidal products (e.g. imidacloprid) and/or with chemicals acting against off-host immature stages (e.g. lufenuron) along with adulticides, if an infestation already pre-exists [7,104,171-174].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, M. A., Jacobs, D. E., Hutchinson, M. J., & Dick, I. G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Bayer Animal Health Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP32 7AH
Venue
Veterinary Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-01
Volume
138
Issue
4
Pages
79-81
ISSN
  • 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7670
OpenAlex
W2130202701
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
flea control, cats, Ctenocephalides felis, fenthion, lufenuron, insect growth regulators, insecticide treatment, flea infestation
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Animals, Benzamides, Cat Diseases, Cats, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Female, Fenthion, Siphonaptera, Fluorocarbons, Insect Control, Insecticides, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review