Cited by 35Dermatological diseases and infestationsHelminth infection and controlYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research

Efficacy dosage titration of lufenuron against developmental stages of fleas (Ctenocephalides felis felis) in cats

Blagbum, Byron L., Vaughan, Joy L., Lindsay, David S., Tebbitt, Guy L.·1994·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

Summary: Thirty-two mixed-breed male and female cats were blocked by sex, arranged by body weight from greatest to least, and allocated to 4 groups of 8 (4 male, 4 female) cats, using random numbers. Cats in each of 3 groups were treated orally with a 7% suspension formulation of lufenuron at dosage of 15, 30, or 45 mg/kg of body weight. Cats in the fourth group were treated orally with an excipient suspension without lufenuron. Cats were infested with newly emerged, unfed cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis felis) on days - 7 and — 3 before treatment and at approximately weekly intervals after treatment. Flea eggs were collected from beneath each cat on selected days before and after treatment and placed in an artificial rearing medium. Flea eggs and medium were kept for 35 days in an insectary to determine effects of lufenuron or excipient suspension on emergence of adults of the F 1 generation. Lufenuron was 100% effective in inhibiting development of C felis at all dosages for 11 days after treatment. Thereafter, efficacy exceeded 92% in all dosages groups. On day 32, when the study was terminated, efficacy for each of the dosage groups was: 15 mg/kg, 95.2%; 30 mg/ kg, 98.2%; and 45 mg/kg, 99.6%. Adverse reactions or side effects were not observed in cats, regardless of treatment dosage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1994.55.01.98

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the case of survival of fleas to an adulticide, and consequent production of eggs, IGRs may ultimately prevent the development of larvae.

    “In the case of survival of fleas to an adulticide, and consequent production of eggs, IGRs may ultimately prevent the development of larvae [104,175].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blagbum, B. L., Vaughan, J. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Tebbitt, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • From the Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849-5519 (Blagburn, Vaughan, Lindsay), and CIBA Animal Health, Greensboro, NC 27419 (Tebbit).
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
98-101
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2396355899
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Keywords
lufenuron, Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides felis felis, flea control, dose titration, cats, oral suspension, efficacy, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Benzamides, Cat Diseases, Cats, Female, Siphonaptera, Fluorocarbons, Insecticides, Male, Oviposition, Parasitic Diseases, Parasitic Diseases, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review