Cited by 108Dermatological diseases and infestationsYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchVector-borne infectious diseases

Survey of flea infestation in dogs and cats in the United Kingdom during 2005

Open access
Bond, R., Riddle, A., Mottram, L., Beugnet, F., Stevenson, R.·2007·Veterinary Record

Abstract

During 2005, 31 uk veterinary practices participated in a survey of flea infestation, during which 2653 dogs and 1508 cats were examined for evidence of flea infestation and skin disease compatible with flea allergy dermatitis ( fad ). The prevalence of flea infestation in the cats was 21·09 per cent, significantly (P<0·001) higher than in the dogs (6·82 per cent). The prevalence of skin lesions compatible with fad in the cats (8·02 per cent) was also significantly (P<0·001) higher than in the dogs (3·32 per cent). Flea infestations were more common in households with cats and with more than one pet. Of 467 fleas identified from the cats, 462 (98·93 per cent) were Ctenocephalides felis , one was Ctenocephalides canis , one was Archaeopsylla erinacei , two were Pulex irritans , and one was Spilopsyllus cuniculi . Of 336 fleas identified from the dogs, 313 (93·15 per cent) were C felis , five were C Canis , 12 were A erinacei , five were P irritans , and one was Ceratophyllus (Nosophyllus) fasciatus . Almost half of the owners of the dogs and cats were unaware of their pet's flea infestation. The overall prevalence of fleas and/or skin lesions that could potentially be compatible with fad was 7·46 per cent in the dogs and 22·28 per cent in the cats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/vr.160.15.503

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Canine and feline pulicosis is characterized by high infection rates everywhere.

    “Canine and feline pulicosis is characterized by high infection rates everywhere [7,9,11-14], thus treatment and prevention are a priority in veterinary medicine.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, R., Riddle, A., Mottram, L., Beugnet, F., & Stevenson, R.
Affiliations
  • Royal Veterinary College (GB)
  • Merial SAS 13c Avenue Einstein 69623 Villeurbanne France
  • Market Harborough Hospital (GB)
Venue
Veterinary Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
160
Issue
15
Pages
503-506
ISSN
  • 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7670
OpenAlex
W1964967979
Cited by
108
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
flea infestation, flea allergy dermatitis, dogs, cats, prevalence, Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides canis, Pulex irritans, Spilopsyllus cuniculi, owner awareness, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dermatitis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Siphonaptera, United Kingdom, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review