Cited by 285Physical Activity and HealthSleep and related disordersContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Fully automated waist-worn accelerometer algorithm for detecting children’s sleep-period time separate from 24-h physical activity or sedentary behaviors

Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Barreira, Tiago V., Schuna, John M., Mire, Emily F., Katzmarzyk, Peter T.·2014·Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Analysis of 24-h waist-worn accelerometer data for physical activity and sedentary behavior requires that sleep-period time (from sleep onset to the end of sleep, including all sleep epochs and wakefulness after onset) is first identified. To identify sleep-period time in children in this study, we evaluated the validity of a published automated algorithm that requires nonaccelerometer bed- and wake-time inputs, relative to a criterion expert visual analysis of minute-by-minute waist-worn accelerometer data, and validated a refined fully automated algorithm. Thirty grade 4 schoolchildren (50% girls) provided 24-h waist-worn accelerometry data. Expert visual inspection (criterion), a published algorithm (Algorithm 1), and 2 additional automated refinements (Algorithm 2, which draws on the instrument's inclinometer function, and Algorithm 3, which focuses on bedtime and wake time points) were applied to a standardized 24-h time block. Paired t tests were used to evaluate differences in mean sleep time (expert criterion minus algorithm estimate). Compared with the criterion, Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2 significantly overestimated sleep time by 43 min and 90 min, respectively. Algorithm 3 produced the smallest mean difference (2 min), and was not significantly different from the criterion. Relative to expert visual inspection, our automated Algorithm 3 produced an estimate that was precise and within expected values for similarly aged children. This fully automated algorithm for 24-h waist-worn accelerometer data will facilitate the separation of sleep time from sedentary behavior and physical activity of all intensities during the remainder of the day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/apnm-2013-0173

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tudor-Locke, C., Barreira, T. V., Schuna, J. M., Mire, E. F., & Katzmarzyk, P. T.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Venue
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2014-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
53-57
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W1882457022
Cited by
285
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coca-Cola Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
children, physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep onset, algorithm validation, inclinometer
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Automation, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Sleep, Time Factors, Sedentary Behavior, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review