Cited by 58Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Academic performance and lifestyle behaviors in Australian school children: a cluster analysis

Dumuid, Dorothea, Olds, Timothy, Martín-Fernández, Josep-Antoni, Lewis, Lucy K., Cassidy, Leah, Maher, Carol·2017·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

Poor academic performance has been linked with particular lifestyle behaviors, such as unhealthy diet, short sleep duration, high screen time, and low physical activity. However, little is known about how lifestyle behavior patterns (or combinations of behaviors) contribute to children's academic performance. We aimed to compare academic performance across clusters of children with common lifestyle behavior patterns. We clustered participants (Australian children aged 9-11 years, n = 284) into four mutually exclusive groups of distinct lifestyle behavior patterns, using the following lifestyle behaviors as cluster inputs: light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity; sedentary behavior and sleep, derived from 24-hour accelerometry; self-reported screen time and diet. Differences in academic performance (measured by a nationally administered standardized test) were detected across the clusters, with scores being lowest in the Junk Food Screenies cluster (unhealthy diet/high screen time) and highest in the Sitters cluster (high nonscreen sedentary behavior/low physical activity). These findings suggest that reduction in screen time and an improved diet may contribute positively to academic performance. While children with high nonscreen sedentary time performed better academically in this study, they also accumulated low levels of physical activity. This warrants further investigation, given the known physical and mental benefits of physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198117699508

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumuid, D., Olds, T., Martín-Fernández, J.-A., Lewis, L. K., Cassidy, L., & Maher, C.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • University of Girona, Girona, Spain
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Department for Education and Child Development (AU)
Corresponding author
Dumuid, Dorothea
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2017-04-23
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
918-927
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2609893148
Cited by
58
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Coca-Cola Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
academic performance, lifestyle habits, elementary school students, physical activity, sedentary behavior, screen time, sleep duration, diet, junk food consumption, Australian children
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Australia, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Health Behavior, Exercise, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review