Cited by 28Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

A snapshot of nitrogen balance in endurance-trained women

Houltham, Stuart Douglas, Rowlands, David S.·2014·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

Indirect estimates of the mean daily protein requirement for female endurance athletes are 1.2–1.4 g·kg−1·day−1; however, an empirical estimate using nitrogen balance is absent. A 72-h nitrogen balance was determined during the mid-follicular phase of 10 female cyclists and triathletes training for 10.8 h·week−1 (SD 2.8) following 2 habituated protein intakes: (i) normal habitual (NH) (protein 85 g·day−1), and (ii) isocaloric high-protein (HP) (∼2-fold increase in protein). Total 72-h nitrogen intake was determined from Leco total combustion of ingested food samples. Nitrogen loss was determined from micro-Kjeldahl analysis of 72-h total urinary nitrogen and representative resting and exercise sweat output, plus estimates for fecal and miscellaneous losses. Habituated (steady state) protein requirement was estimated from the mean regression of adapted nitrogen balance vs nitrogen intake. Mean (SD) 24-h dietary protein and energy intake was NH: 1.4 g·kg−1·day−1 (0.2), energy: 9078 kJ·day−1 (1492), HP: 2.7 g·kg−1·day−1 (0.3) 8909 kJ·day−1 (1411). Average 24-h urinary nitrogen and sweat urea nitrogen outputs were 13.2 g·day−1 (2.4) and 0.33 g·day−1 (0.08) in NH; 21.5 g·day−1 (3.9) and 0.54 g·day−1 (0.12) in HP, respectively. Nitrogen balance was negative in NH (−0.59 gN·day−1 SD 1.64) but positive in HP (2.69 gN·day−1 SD 3.09). Estimated mean protein requirement was 1.63 g·kg−1·day−1 (95% confidence interval: 1.1–3.8). In conclusion the snapshot of follicular phase dietary protein requirement conformed with previous estimates for men, but was higher than previous nonempirical estimates for endurance-training women; low self-selected energy and carbohydrate intakes may explain the higher than expected nitrogen turnover, and consequently protein requirement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/apnm-2013-0182

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houltham, S. D., & Rowlands, D. S.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2014-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
219-225
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W1855806657
Cited by
28
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Massey University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
nitrogen balance, protein requirements, female endurance athletes, high-protein diet, urinary nitrogen, follicular phase, cyclists, triathletes, energy intake, nitrogen turnover
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Nitrogen, Physical Endurance, Sports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review