Cited by 806Innovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology

Cesaretti, Giovanni, Dini, Enrico, De Kestelier, Xavier, Colla, Valentina, Pambaguian, Laurent·2014·Acta Astronautica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The material under discussion possesses properties comparable to conventional terrestrial clay bricks and non-sintered chemically bonded D-shaped manufactured blocks and holds potential for practical applications.

    “The comparisons show that the material under discussion possesses properties comparable to these established materials and holds potential for practical applications.”
  • Thermal expansion of the printed blocks was found to be relatively low.

    “The thermal expansion was found to be relatively low, indicating that the material is less prone to significant dimensional changes in response to temperature variations.”
  • Cesaretti et al. did not assess powder and chemical emissions during the printing process.

    “Cesaretti et al. also did not assess powder and chemical emissions during the printing process, raising concerns about their approach's alignment with sustainability practices.”
  • Cesaretti et al. successfully printed building blocks for habitat wall structures with closed foam topology.

    “Cesaretti et al. [52] built upon earlier research by Ceccanti et al. [295] and successfully printed building blocks for habitat wall structures with a specific topology known as closed foam.”
  • The printed blocks had compression strength of 20.35 MPa, flexural strength of 7 MPa, and Young's modulus of 2.35 GPa.

    “They showcased a compression strength of 20.35 MPa , flexural strength of 7 MPa , and Young's modulus of 2.35 GPa .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., Colla, V., & Pambaguian, L.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Colla, Valentina
Venue
Acta Astronautica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
93
Pages
430-450
ISSN
0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984025219
Cited by
806
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Space Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
3D printing, lunar regolith, lunar base, regolith simulants, in-situ resource utilization, vacuum testing, habitat design, mechanical properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review