CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249Sports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological ResponsesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acute and Chronic Hormonal Responses to Resistance Training Designed to Promote Muscle Hypertrophy

Mccall, Gary E., Byrnes, William C., Fleck, Steven J., Dickinson, Arthur, Kraemer, William J.·1999·Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology
DOI 10.1139/h99-009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Acute and chronic hormonal responses to resistance training were evaluated in 11 college men who completed 12 weeks (33 sessions) of high volume resistance training. No differences in resting concentrations of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-I, testosterone, or sex hormone-binding globulin occurred from pre- and posttraining in the trained vs. nontrained control group. However, cortisol (c) decreased 17% for both groups (p < 0.05). There were no differences in exercise-induced responses between Sessions 10 and 20, with all hormone concentrations increasing (p < 0.05) from pre- at mid- and post exercise session. However, after correction for plasma volume decreases, only C and GH showed differences, with C increased from mid- to postsession (48% 10th; 49% 20th), and GH increased from pre- at mid- and postsession for both sessions 10 (0.16 +/- 0.42 pre; 4.77 +/- 6.24 mid; 6.26 +/- 5.19 post; microg x L-1) and 20 (0.33 +/- 0.85 pre; 5.42 +/- 9.08 mid; 8.24 +/- 7.61 post; microg x L-1). Significant correlations (p< 0.05) existed only between absolute mean GH increases from presession and the degree of muscle fiber hypertrophy for type I (r = 0.70 mid, 0.74 post) and type II (r = 0.71 post) fibers. In conclusion, resistance training had no effect on resting serum hormone concentrations, whereas similar acute exercise responses occurred between the 10th and 20th training sessions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/h99-009

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 249

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mccall, G. E., Byrnes, W. C., Fleck, S. J., Dickinson, A., & Kraemer, W. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Venue
Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
96-107
ISSN
1066-7814 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1139/h99-009
OpenAlex
W2094212126
Cited by
249
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining (tdm)
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, growth hormone, cortisol, insulin-like growth factor I, testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, muscle fiber type
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Hormones, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Physical Education and Training, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Weight Lifting, Human Growth Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review