Cited by 29Biofield Effects and BiophysicsMedical Research and TreatmentsTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

The effect of qigong exercise on immunity and infections: a systematic review of controlled trials

Wang, Chong-Wen, Ng, Siu-Man, Ho, Rainbow T.H., Ziea, Eric T.C., Wong, Vivian C.W., Chan, Cecilia L.W.·2012·The American Journal of Chinese Medicine

Abstract

The objective of this review was to summarize and critically evaluate the clinical evidence of the effect of qigong exercise on immunity and its efficacy in the prevention or treatment of infectious diseases. Thirteen databases were searched from their respective inceptions through January 2011, and all controlled clinical trials of qigong exercise on immunity and infections were included. Quality and validity of the included studies were evaluated using standard scales. Seven studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and three retrospective observational studies (ROSs) met the inclusion criteria. One study focused on functional measures of immunity (antigen-induced immunity) and six studies on enumerative parameters of immunity. No study on clinical symptoms relevant to infectious diseases could be identified. Overall, the included studies suggested favorable effects of qigong exercise on immunity, but the quality of research for most of the studies examined in this review was poor. Further rigorously designed studies are required, which should adhere to accepted standards of methodology for clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0192415x1250084x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C.-W., Ng, S.-M., Ho, R. T. H., Ziea, E. T. C., Wong, V. C. W., & Chan, C. L. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China
  • Hospital Authority (HK)
Venue
The American Journal of Chinese Medicine
Published
2012-01
Volume
40
Issue
06
Pages
1143-1156
ISSN
  • 0090-2942 (ISSN-L)
  • 0192-415X
  • 1793-6853
OpenAlex
W2094627390
Cited by
29
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Chinese Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medical Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
qigong, physical activity, immunity, infectious diseases, infection control, infection treatment, traditional Chinese medicine
MeSH terms
Breathing Exercises, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communicable Disease Control, Communicable Diseases, Humans, Immunity, Prospective Studies, Spain, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review