The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THERE IS SOMETHING OUT THERE: DISTAL ATTRIBUTION IN SENSORY SUBSTITUTION, TWENTY YEARS LATER
Open accessAbstract
Sensory substitution constitutes an interesting domain of study to consider the philosopher's classical question of distal attribution: how we can distinguish between a sensation and the perception of an object that causes this sensation. We tested the hypothesis that distal attribution consists of three distinct components: an object, a perceptual space, and a coupling between subjects' movements and stimulation. We equipped sixty participants with a visual-to-auditory substitution device, without any information about it. The device converts the video stream produced by a head-mounted camera into a sound stream. We investigated several experimental conditions: the existence or not of a correlation between movements and resulting stimulation, the direct or indirect manipulation of an object, and the presence of a background environment. Participants were asked to describe their impressions by rating their experiences in terms of seven possible "scenarios". These scenarios were carefully chosen to distinguish the degree to which the participants attributed their sensations to a distal cause. Participants rated the scenarios both before and after they were given the possibility to interrupt the stimulation with an obstacle. We were interested in several questions. Did participants extract laws of co-variation between their movements and resulting stimulation? Did they deduce the existence of a perceptual space originating from this coupling? Did they individuate objects that caused the sensations? Whatever the experimental conditions, participants were able to establish that there was a link between their movements and the resulting auditory stimulation. Detection of the existence of a coupling was more frequent than the inferences of distal space and object.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems
West, C. K., & Gibson, J. J. (1969) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.2307/3331482 · Cited by 6,344
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E. H., & Thompson, E. T. (2017) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 5,910
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness
O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115 · Cited by 3,126
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems
Kensler, G. L., & Gibson, J. J. (1969) · Studies in Art Education · doi:10.2307/1319633 · Cited by 2,773
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 · Cited by 2,449
Vision substitution by tactile image projection
BACH-Y-RITA, P., COLLINS, C. C., SAUNDERS, F. A., WHITE, B., & SCADDEN, L. (1969) · Nature · doi:10.1038/221963a0 · Cited by 956
An experimental system for auditory image representations
Meijer, P. B. L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.121642 · Cited by 900
Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface
Bach-y-Rita, P., & W. Kercel, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013 · Cited by 858
Brooks, R. A. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1716.001.0001 · Cited by 684
La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant
Piaget, J. (1936) · Delachaux et Niestlé eBooks · Cited by 676
Cambrian intelligence: the early history of the new AI
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3388 · Cited by 514
Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution
Bach‐y‐Rita, P. (1972) · Cited by 404
La construction du réel chez l'enfant
Piaget, J. (1967) · Delachaux et Niestlé eBooks · Cited by 383
Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution
Krieg, W. J. S. (1973) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(73)90016-3 · Cited by 337
White, B. W., Saunders, F. A., Scadden, L., Bach-Y-Rita, P., & Collins, C. C. (1970) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03210126 · Cited by 232
EMERGING CONCEPTS OF BRAIN FUNCTION
Bach‐y‐Rita, P. (2005) · Journal of Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.1142/s0219635205000768 · Cited by 56
de Condillac, É. B. (2010) · doi:10.1522/030166757 · Cited by 53
Is There Anything out There?: A Study of Distal Attribution in Response to Vibrotactile Stimulation
EPSTEIN, W. M., Hughes, B. G., Schneider, S. L., & Bach‐y‐Rita, P. (1986) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p150275 · Cited by 49
Helmholtz’s Contributions to Physiological Optics*
Troland, L. T. (1922) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.6.000327 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Helmholtz H., 1909, Physiological Optics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational aspects of pain
Auvray, M., Myin, E., & Spence, C. J. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.008 · Cited by 256
Self-citationPerception With Compensatory Devices: From Sensory Substitution to Sensorimotor Extension
Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x · Cited by 164
Self-citationCortical plasticity and preserved function in early blindness
Renier, L., De Volder, A. G., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.025 · Cited by 144
Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in HCI
Visell, Y. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.08.004 · Cited by 148
Gori, M., Cappagli, G., Tonelli, A., Baud‐Bovy, G., & Finocchietti, S. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.043 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- AUVRAY, M., HANNETON, S., LENAY, C., & O'REGAN, K.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Neuroscience
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 04
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 505-521
- ISSN
- 0219-6352 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-448X
- OpenAlex
- W2127762938
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- sensory substitution, object perception, perceptual space, covariation, object individuation, head-mounted camera
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Perception, Equipment and Supplies, Humans, Movement, Neuronal Plasticity, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review