The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour
Abstract
Our research explores what we call compilation behaviour: the programming behaviour a student engages in while repeatedly editing and compiling their programs. This edit-compile cycle often represents students' attempts to make their programs syntactically, as opposed to semantically, correct. Over the course of two years, we have observed first-year university students learning to program in Java, collecting and studying thousands of snapshots of their programs from one compilation to the next. At the University of Kent, students are introduced to programming in an objects-first style using BlueJ, an environment intended for use by novice programmers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers.
Chism, N. V. N., Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1995) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2943957 · Cited by 2,058
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x · Cited by 1,410
The Cornell program synthesizer: a syntax-directed programming environment
Teitelbaum, T., & Reps, T. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358746.358755 · Cited by 710
McCracken, M., Almstrum, V., Diaz, D., Guzdial, M., Hagan, D., Kolikant, Y. B.-D., Laxer, C., Thomas, L., Utting, I., & Wilusz, T. (2001) · Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education · doi:10.1145/572133.572137 · Cited by 626
A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers
Lister, R., Adams, E. S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Seppälä, O., et al. (2004) · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1041624.1041673 · Cited by 575
The BlueJ System and its Pedagogy
Kölling, M., Quig, B., Patterson, A., & Rosenberg, J. (2003) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1076/csed.13.4.249.17496 · Cited by 484
Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior
Ko, A. J., & Myers, B. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/985692.985712 · Cited by 361
DrScheme: a programming environment for Scheme
FINDLER, R. B., CLEMENTS, J., FLANAGAN, C., FLATT, M., KRISHNAMURTHI, S., STECKLER, P., & FELLEISEN, M. (2002) · Journal of Functional Programming · doi:10.1017/s0956796801004208 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Introductory programming: a systematic literature review
Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, Albluwi, I., Becker, B. A., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A. N., Ott, L., Paterson, J., Scott, M. J., Sheard, J., et al. (2018) · Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3293881.3295779 · Cited by 485
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers' Help Requests
Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., Sarsa, S., Koutcheme, C., Kujanpää, L., & Sorva, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05715 · Cited by 211
Becker, B. A., Denny, P., Pettit, R., Bouchard, D., Bouvier, D. J., Harrington, B., Kamil, A., Karkare, A., McDonald, C., Osera, P.-M., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3344429.3372508 · Cited by 199
All syntax errors are not equal
Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Tempero, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education · doi:10.1145/2325296.2325318 · Cited by 144
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests
Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., Sarsa, S., Koutcheme, C., Kujanpää, L., & Sorva, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 · doi:10.1145/3568813.3600139 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Jadud, M. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-09-09
- Pages
- 73-84
- OpenAlex
- W2036955327
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1151588.1151600
- The paper
- Jadud, M. C. (2006). Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour. Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151588.1151600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
