The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion spam and analysis
Abstract
Evaluative texts on the Web have become a valuable source of opinions on products, services, events, individuals, etc. Recently, many researchers have studied such opinion sources as product reviews, forum posts, and blogs. However, existing research has been focused on classification and summarization of opinions using natural language processing and data mining techniques. An important issue that has been neglected so far is opinion spam or trustworthiness of online opinions. In this paper, we study this issue in the context of product reviews, which are opinion rich and are widely used by consumers and product manufacturers. In the past two years, several startup companies also appeared which aggregate opinions from product reviews. It is thus high time to study spam in reviews. To the best of our knowledge, there is still no published study on this topic, although Web spam and email spam have been investigated extensively. We will see that opinion spam is quite different from Web spam and email spam, and thus requires different detection techniques. Based on the analysis of 5.8 million reviews and 2.14 million reviewers from amazon.com, we show that opinion spam in reviews is widespread. This paper analyzes such spam activities and presents some novel techniques to detect them
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Disinformation can take forms beyond the production of hoaxes or “fake news” (Lazer et al., 2018); and include other types of manipulation of social systems, such as Google bombs to associate a keyword to a URL by repeatedly searching for the keyword and clicking on the URL, or review spam (Jindal and Liu, 2008) to manipulate the reputation of a product/service.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Jindal and Liu, 2008
Citations
Cites
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Self-citationThumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02 · doi:10.3115/1118693.1118704 · Cited by 7,024
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,646
Turney, P. D. (2001) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073153 · Cited by 2,354
Dave, K. S., Lawrence, S., & Pennock, D. M. (2003) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/775152.775226 · Cited by 1,925
On the resemblance and containment of documents
Broder, A. (2002) · Compression and Complexity of Sequences (SEQUENCES) · doi:10.1109/sequen.1997.666900 · Cited by 1,818
Extracting product features and opinions from reviews
Popescu, A.-M., & Etzioni, O. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220618 · Cited by 1,714
A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail
Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D. E., & Horvitz, E. (1998) · Cited by 1,212
Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2718 · Cited by 1,181
Mining the Web: Discovering Knowledge from Hypertext Data
Chakrabarti, S. (2002) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 696
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,002
NetSpam: A Network-Based Spam Detection Framework for Reviews in Online Social Media
Shehnepoor, S., Salehi, M., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crespi, N. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2675361 · Cited by 165
Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning
Li, H., Chen, Z., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Shao, J. (2014) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2014.47 · Cited by 168
Self-citationGraduate Theses and Dissertations
Davis, M., Davis, K. J., & Dunagan, M. M. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384727-0.00006-9 · Cited by 165
Semi-supervised SVM batch mode active learning for image retrieval
Hoi, S. C. H., Jin, R., Zhu, J., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2008) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587350 · Cited by 162
The Role of Emotions for the Perceived Usefulness in Online Customer Reviews
Felbermayr, A., & Νανόπουλος, Α. (2016) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.05.004 · Cited by 172
Uncovering collusive spammers in Chinese review websites
Xu, C., Zhang, J., Chang, K., & Long, C. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2505515.2505700 · Cited by 159
Munzel, A. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.06.002 · Cited by 166
Document representation and feature combination for deceptive spam review detection
Li, L., Qin, B., Ren, W., & Liu, T. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.080 · Cited by 156
Automated Crowdturfing Attacks and Defenses in Online Review Systems
Yao, Y., Viswanath, B., Cryan, J., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3133990 · Cited by 150
Star Quality: Aggregating Reviews to Rank Products and Merchants
McGlohon, M., Glance, N., & Reiter, Z. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14019 · Cited by 150
Crowd intelligence: Analyzing online product reviews for preference measurement
Xiao, S., Wei, C., & Dong, M. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.09.010 · Cited by 151
Inducing a Lexicon of Abusive Words – a Feature-Based Approach
Wiegand, M., Ruppenhofer, J., Schmidt, A. G., & Greenberg, C. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1095 · Cited by 155
Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews
Zhuang, M., Cui, G., & Peng, L. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.016 · Cited by 155
Detecting deceptive reviews using lexical and syntactic features
Shojaee, S., Murad, M. A. A., Azman, A., Sharef, N. M., & Nadali, S. (2013) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA) · doi:10.1109/isda.2013.6920707 · Cited by 147
Lexicon-based Comments-oriented News Sentiment Analyzer system
Moreo, A., Romero, M., Castro, J. L., & Zurita, J. M. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.057 · Cited by 146
A review of sentiment analysis: tasks, applications, and deep learning techniques
Sharma, N. A., Ali, A. B. M. S., & Kabir, M. A. (2024) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-024-00594-x · Cited by 191
A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and OpportunitiesPreprint
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.00315 · Cited by 145
From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online ReviewsPreprint
McAuley, J., & Leskovec, J. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1303.4402 · Cited by 143
Breaking the Closed World Assumption in Text Classification
Fei, G., & Liu, B. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1061 · Cited by 138
Self-citationImproving Opinion Aspect Extraction Using Semantic Similarity and Aspect Associations
Liu, Q., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Kim, D. S., & Gao, Z. (2016) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10373 · Cited by 141
Self-citationThe Enhancing Versus Backfiring Effects of Positive Emotion in Consumer Reviews
Rocklage, M. D., & Fázio, R. H. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719892594 · Cited by 147
Bimodal Distribution and Co-Bursting in Review Spam Detection
Li, H., Fei, G., Wang, S., Liu, B., Shao, W., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052582 · Cited by 141
Self-citationTowards understanding and detecting fake reviews in app stores
Martens, D., & Maalej, W. (2019) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09706-9 · Cited by 145
Fake Reviews Detection using Supervised Machine Learning
Elmogy, A., Tariq, U., Mohammed, A., & Ibrahim, A. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120169 · Cited by 137
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale LearningPreprint
Li, P., Shrivastava, A., Moore, J. L., & König, A. C. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.0967 · Cited by 137
Ranking Comments on the Social Web
Hsu, C.-F., Khabiri, E., & Caverlee, J. (2009) · doi:10.1109/cse.2009.109 · Cited by 136
Wang, W. M., Li, Z., Tian, Z., Wang, J., & Cheng, M. (2018) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.05.005 · Cited by 136
Castillo, C., & Davison, B. D. (2010) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/1500000021 · Cited by 136
Serf and turf: crowdturfing for fun and profit
Wang, G., Wilson, C., Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., Mohanlal, M., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187928 · Cited by 197
Plotkina, D., Munzel, A., & Pallud, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.009 · Cited by 134
Suspicious Behavior Detection: Current Trends and Future Directions
Jiang, M., Cui, P., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.5 · Cited by 132
Approaches to Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review
Al-Moslmi, T., Omar, N., Abdullah, S., & Albared, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2690342 · Cited by 129
Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning for Online Deceptive Review Detection
Rout, J. K., Dalmia, A., Choo, K. R., Bakshi, S., & Jena, S. K. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2655032 · Cited by 130
"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
Lai, V., Liu, H., & Tan, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376873 · Cited by 123
Identifying influential reviewers for word-of-mouth marketing
Li, Y.-M., Lin, C.-H., & Lai, C.-Y. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.02.004 · Cited by 121
Learning multiple layers of knowledge representation for aspect based sentiment analysis
Pham, D.-H., & Le, A.-C. (2017) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2017.06.001 · Cited by 119
Zhang, W., Du, Y., Yoshida, T., & Wang, Q. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.03.007 · Cited by 122
Analyzing and Detecting Opinion Spam on a Large-scale Dataset via Temporal and Spatial Patterns
Li, H., Chen, Z., Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., & Shao, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14652 · Cited by 117
Self-citationFake review detection on online E-commerce platforms: a systematic literature review
Paul, H., & Nikolaev, A. G. (2021) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-021-00772-6 · Cited by 126
Detection of fake opinions using time series
Heydari, A., Tavakoli, M. A., & Salim, N. B. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.020 · Cited by 118
Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Aghakhani, H., Machiry, A., Nilizadeh, S., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2018) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw.2018.00022 · Cited by 118
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Hussain, N., Mirza, H. T., Rasool, G., Hussain, I., & Kaleem, M. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9050987 · Cited by 122
Extracting relevant knowledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web
Justo, R., Corcoran, T., Lukin, S. M., Walker, M., & Torres, M. I. (2014) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.021 · Cited by 112
BIRDNEST: Bayesian Inference for Ratings-Fraud Detection
Hooi, B., Shah, N., Beutel, A., Günnemann, S., Akoglu, L., Kumar, M., Makhija, D., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611974348.56 · Cited by 118
Graph-based review spammer group detection
Wang, Z., Gu, S., Zhao, X., & Xu, X. (2017) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1068-7 · Cited by 112
From conflicts and confusion to doubts: Examining review inconsistency for fake review detection
Shan, G., Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113513 · Cited by 117
Social Spammer Detection with Sentiment Information
Hu, X., Tang, J., Gao, H., & Liu, H. (2014) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2014.141 · Cited by 108
Persuasion, Emotion, and Language: The Intent to Persuade Transforms Language via Emotionality
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617744797 · Cited by 124
The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6 · Cited by 106
Towards automatic filtering of fake reviews
Cardoso, E. F., Silva, R. M., & Almeida, T. A. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.074 · Cited by 111
Discovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints
Ye, J., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23528-8_17 · Cited by 107
Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining From Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product Design
Jin, J., Liu, Y., Ji, P., & Kwong, C. K. (2018) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4041087 · Cited by 105
Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective
Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102286 · Cited by 108
Fighting post-truth using natural language processing: A review and open challenges
Saquete, E., Tomás, D., Moreda, P., Martínez-Barco, P., & Palomar, M. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112943 · Cited by 111
Puschmann, C., & Powell, A. B. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118797724 · Cited by 114
Natural Language Processing for Social Media
Farzindar, A., & Inkpen, D. Z. (2015) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00659ed1v01y201508hlt030 · Cited by 101
Comprehensive Review of Opinion Summarization
Kim, H. D., Ganesan, K., Sondhi, P., & Zhai, C. (2011) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 97
Detecting Deceptive Opinions with Profile Compatibility
Feng, V. W., & Hirst, G. (2013) · Cited by 98
Detection of opinion spam based on anomalous rating deviation
Savage, D., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Chou, P. L., & Wang, Q. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.019 · Cited by 97
Positive Unlabeled Learning for Deceptive Reviews Detection
Ren, Y., Ji, D., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1055 · Cited by 97
Moghaddam, S., Jamali, M., & Ester, M. (2012) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2124295.2124316 · Cited by 95
Content analysis of fake consumer reviews by survey-based text categorization
Sangkil Moon, A., Kim, M.-Y., & Iacobucci, D. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.08.001 · Cited by 97
An intelligent recommendation system in e-commerce using ensemble learning
Shankar, A., Perumal, P., Subramanian, M., Naresh, R., Natesan, D., Kulkarni, V. R., & Stephan, T. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17415-1 · Cited by 106
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Uncovering Crowdsourced Manipulation of Online Reviews
Fayazi, A., Lee, K., Caverlee, J., & Squicciarini, A. (2015) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767742 · Cited by 98
Ruffo, G., Semeraro, A., Giachanou, A., & Rosso, P. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2022.100531 · Cited by 130
Affective topic model for social emotion detection
Rao, Y., Li, Q., Wenyin, L., Wu, Q., & Quan, X. (2014) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.05.007 · Cited by 92
Deceptive review detection using labeled and unlabeled data
Rout, J. K., Singh, S., Jena, S. K., & Bakshi, S. (2016) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-016-3819-y · Cited by 93
Mining the real-time web: A novel approach to product recommendation
Esparza, S. G., O’Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2011) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.007 · Cited by 90
Detecting Singleton Review Spammers Using Semantic Similarity
Sandulescu, V., & Ester, M. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2742570 · Cited by 92
Detecting Review Spammer Groups via Bipartite Graph Projection
Wang, Z., Hou, T., Song, D., Li, Z., & Kong, T. (2015) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxv068 · Cited by 89
The App Sampling Problem for App Store Mining
Martin, W., Harman, M., Jia, Y., Sarro, F., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Cited by 87
Sentiment Analysis using SVM: A Systematic Literature Review
Ahmad, M., Aftab, S., Salman, M., & Hameed, N. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090226 · Cited by 87
Deep Structure Learning for Fraud Detection
Wang, H., Zhou, C. D., Wu, J. X., Dang, W., Xingquan Zhu, A., & Wang, J. (2018) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2018.00072 · Cited by 86
Discovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints
Ye, J., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks · doi:10.1145/2817946.2820606 · Cited by 84
WoLMIS: a labor market intelligence system for classifying web job vacancies
Boselli, R., Cesarini, M., Marrara, S., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., Pasi, G., & Viviani, M. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-017-0488-x · Cited by 89
Graph-Based Fraud Detection in the Face of Camouflage
Hooi, B., Shin, K., Song, H. A., Beutel, A., Shah, N., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3056563 · Cited by 84
Mukherjee, A., & Liu, B. (2012) · Cited by 84
Self-citationFerrara, E. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3299768 · Cited by 92
Kim, A. E., Hopper, T., Simpson, S. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., Lieberman, A., Hansen, H. M., Guillory, J. E., & Porter, L. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4466 · Cited by 82
Spam Review Detection Using Deep Learning
Shahariar, G. M., Biswas, S., Omar, F., Shah, F. M., & Hassan, S. B. (2019) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936148 · Cited by 91
Kaur, R., & Kautish, S. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6303-1.ch098 · Cited by 84
An unsupervised topic-sentiment joint probabilistic model for detecting deceptive reviews
Dong, L., Ji, S., Zhang, C.-J., Zhang, Q., Chiu, D. K. W., Qiu, L., & Li, D. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.005 · Cited by 82
Detecting Anomalous Online Reviewers: An Unsupervised Approach Using Mixture Models
Kumar, N., Venugopal, D., Qiu, L., & Kumar, S. (2019) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1661089 · Cited by 84
Spotting Fake Reviews using Positive-Unlabeled Learning
Li, H., Liu, B., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2014) · Computación y Sistemas · doi:10.13053/cys-18-3-2035 · Cited by 84
Self-citationUsing Deep Linguistic Features for Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam
Xu, Q., & Zhao, H. (2012) · Cited by 82
Rocklage, M. D., & Fázio, R. H. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005 · Cited by 81
Efficient Confident Search in Large Review Corpora
Lappas, T., & Gunopulos, D. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15883-4_13 · Cited by 80
‘twazn me!!! ;(’ Automatic Authorship Analysis of Micro-Blogging Messages
Sousa‐Silva, R., Laboreiro, G., Sarmento, L., Grant, T., Oliveira, E., & Maia, B. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22327-3_16 · Cited by 80
Exploring Linkability of User Reviews
Almishari, M., & Tsudik, G. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_18 · Cited by 80
Sedhai, S., & Sun, A. (2015) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767701 · Cited by 82
The FLDA model for aspect-based opinion mining
Moghaddam, S., & Ester, M. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488467 · Cited by 79
A Tangled Web: Should Online Review Portals Display Fraudulent Reviews?
Ananthakrishnan, U. M., Li, B., & Smith, M. D. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0925 · Cited by 84
Sentiment analysis of clinical narratives: A scoping review
Denecke, K., & Reichenpfader, D. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104336 · Cited by 83
Detecting Deceptive Opinion Spam Using Human Computation
Harris, C. G. (2012) · Cited by 79
Towards building a social emotion detection system for online news
Lei, J., Rao, Y., Li, Q., Quan, X., & Wenyin, L. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.09.024 · Cited by 78
Cross domain recommendation based on multi-type media fusion
Tan, S., Bu, J., Qin, X., Chen, C., & Cai, D. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.08.034 · Cited by 79
Graph-based Anomaly Detection and Description: A SurveyPreprint
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.4679 · Cited by 76
Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection Using Neural Network
Ren, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 71
Handling Cold-Start Problem in Review Spam Detection by Jointly Embedding Texts and Behaviors
Wang, X., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1034 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Jindal, N., & Liu, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Liu, Bing
- Venue
- Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 219
- OpenAlex
- W2047756776
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 77
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- opinion spam, spam detection, product reviews, online reviews, review aggregation, Amazon reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
