The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion spam and analysis
Abstract
Evaluative texts on the Web have become a valuable source of opinions on products, services, events, individuals, etc. Recently, many researchers have studied such opinion sources as product reviews, forum posts, and blogs. However, existing research has been focused on classification and summarization of opinions using natural language processing and data mining techniques. An important issue that has been neglected so far is opinion spam or trustworthiness of online opinions. In this paper, we study this issue in the context of product reviews, which are opinion rich and are widely used by consumers and product manufacturers. In the past two years, several startup companies also appeared which aggregate opinions from product reviews. It is thus high time to study spam in reviews. To the best of our knowledge, there is still no published study on this topic, although Web spam and email spam have been investigated extensively. We will see that opinion spam is quite different from Web spam and email spam, and thus requires different detection techniques. Based on the analysis of 5.8 million reviews and 2.14 million reviewers from amazon.com, we show that opinion spam in reviews is widespread. This paper analyzes such spam activities and presents some novel techniques to detect them
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Disinformation can take forms beyond the production of hoaxes or “fake news” (Lazer et al., 2018); and include other types of manipulation of social systems, such as Google bombs to associate a keyword to a URL by repeatedly searching for the keyword and clicking on the URL, or review spam (Jindal and Liu, 2008) to manipulate the reputation of a product/service.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Jindal and Liu, 2008
Citations
Cites
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Self-citationThumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02 · doi:10.3115/1118693.1118704 · Cited by 7,024
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,646
Turney, P. D. (2001) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073153 · Cited by 2,354
Dave, K. S., Lawrence, S., & Pennock, D. M. (2003) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/775152.775226 · Cited by 1,925
On the resemblance and containment of documents
Broder, A. (2002) · Compression and Complexity of Sequences (SEQUENCES) · doi:10.1109/sequen.1997.666900 · Cited by 1,818
Extracting product features and opinions from reviews
Popescu, A.-M., & Etzioni, O. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220618 · Cited by 1,714
A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail
Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D. E., & Horvitz, E. (1998) · Cited by 1,212
Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2718 · Cited by 1,181
Mining the Web: Discovering Knowledge from Hypertext Data
Chakrabarti, S. (2002) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 696
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,002
Detecting Fake Review with Rumor Model—Case Study in Hotel Review
Chang, T., Hsu, P. Y., Cheng, M. S., Chung, C.-Y., & Chung, Y.-L. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18 · Cited by 15
Collusive Opinion Fraud Detection in Online Reviews
Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3098859 · Cited by 16
Detecting spam reviewers by combing reviewer feature and relationship
Liang, D., Liu, X., & Shen, H. (2014) · International Conference on Informative and Cybernetics for Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/iccss.2014.6961824 · Cited by 15
Recital of supervised learning on review spam detection: An empirical analysis
Khurshid, F., Zhu, Y., Yohannese, C. W., & Iqbal, M. (2017) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE) · doi:10.1109/iske.2017.8258755 · Cited by 16
Extracting Customer Reviews from Online Shopping and Its Perspective on Product Design
Anh, K. Q., Nagai, Y., & Nguyen, L.-M. (2019) · Vietnam Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1142/s2196888819500088 · Cited by 11
Technologies for Reusing Text from the Web
Potthast, M. (2012) · Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) · doi:10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1566 · Cited by 15
From Opinions to Recommendations
O’Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_13 · Cited by 14
Collusive shill bidding detection in online auctions using Markov Random Field
Majadi, N., Trevathan, J., & Bergmann, N. W. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100831 · Cited by 14
Review Manipulation: Literature Review, and Future Research Agenda
Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2021) · Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1pais.13104 · Cited by 18
Zhang, Q., Liang, Z., Ji, S., Xing, B., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2023) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-023-00159-8 · Cited by 16
Bengali fake reviews: A benchmark dataset and detection system
Shahariar, G. M., Shawon, M. T. R., Shah, F. M., Alam, M. S., & Mahbub, M. S. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127732 · Cited by 18
LINQ: A Framework for Location-Aware Indexing and Query Processing
Liu, X., Chen, L., & Wan, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2014.2365792 · Cited by 14
A deceptive detection model based on topic, sentiment, and sentence structure information
Du, X., Zhu, R., Zhao, F., Zhao, F., Han, P., & Zhu, Z. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01779-0 · Cited by 14
A proposed system for opinion mining using machine learning, NLP and classifiers
Tanwar, P., & Rai, P. (2020) · IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.11591/ijai.v9.i4.pp726-733 · Cited by 15
Opinion Spam Detection: A New Approach Using Machine Learning and Network-Based Algorithms
Danilchenko, K., Segal, M., & Vilenchik, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19278 · Cited by 17
Confidence-Aware Sentiment Quantification via Sentiment Perturbation Modeling
Tang, X., Liao, D., Shen, M., Zhu, L., Huang, S., Li, G., Man, H., & Xu, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3301956 · Cited by 14
Detecting Negative Deceptive Opinion from Tweets
Molla, A., Biadgie, Y., & Sohn, K.-A. (2017) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5281-1_36 · Cited by 14
An Analysis of E-Commerce Identification Using Sentimental Analysis: A Survey
Pandiaraja, P., Aishwarya, S., Indubala, S. V., Neethiga, S., & Sanjana, K. (2022) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2719-5_69 · Cited by 13
Duma, R. A., Niu, Z., Nyamawe, A. S., Tchaye-Kondi, J., Chambua, J., & Yusuf, A. A. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15193-4 · Cited by 13
Rethinking Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection With Deep Learning: Residuals and Objectives
Ma, X., Liu, F., Wu, J. X., Yang, J., Xue, S., & Sheng, Q. Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3501307 · Cited by 17
An Empirical Study of Online Consumer Review Spam: A Design Science Approach
Lau, R. Y. K., Liao, S. S., & Xu, K. S. J. (2010) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 13
An investigation of online review helpfulness based on movie reviews
Liu, Z., Li, H., & Liu, L. (2014) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm11.2628 · Cited by 13
Valli, M. S., & Arasu, G. T. (2016) · Cited by 13
Identifying Helpful Online Reviews with Word Embedding Features
Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Niu, Z. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_10 · Cited by 13
Cooks Distance and Mahanabolis Distance Outlier Detection Methods to identify Review Spam
Algur, S. P. (2017) · International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science · doi:10.18535/ijecs/v6i6.16 · Cited by 13
An ensemble method for the credibility assessment of user-generated content
Fontanarava, J., Pasi, G., & Viviani, M. (2017) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3106426.3106464 · Cited by 16
Open Set Text Classification Using CNNs
Prakhya, S., Venkataram, V., & Kalita, J. K. (2017) · International conference natural language processing · Cited by 30
Martens, D., & Maalej, W. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB) · doi:10.1145/3194113.3194120 · Cited by 13
Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Principles of Big Data
Rout, J. K., Dalmia, A., Rath, S. K., Mohanta, B. K., Ramasubbareddy, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3097805 · Cited by 13
Detecting Fake Reviews using Machine learning techniques: a survey
Agarwal, R., & Sharma, D. K. (2022) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite53722.2022.9823633 · Cited by 14
Tri-Training for authorship attribution with limited training data: a comprehensive study
Qian, T., Liu, B., Chen, L., Peng, Z., Zhong, M., He, G., Li, X., & Xu, G. (2015) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.064 · Cited by 13
Self-citationTowards bounding sequential patterns
Raïssi, C., & Pei, J. (2011) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2020408.2020612 · Cited by 13
Learning to Estimate Slide Comprehension in Classrooms with Support Vector Machines
Pattanasri, N., Mukunoki, M., & Minoh, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2011.22 · Cited by 13
Nebular: A sentiment classification system for the tourism business
Palakvangsa-Na-Ayudhya, S., Sriarunrungreung, V., Thongprasan, P., & Porcharoen, S. (2011) · International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/jcsse.2011.5930137 · Cited by 13
Diversionary comments under political blog posts
Wang, J., Yu, C. T., Yu, P. S., Liu, B., & Meng, W. (2012) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2396761.2398518 · Cited by 13
Self-citationSentiment Analysis in Social Streams
Saif, H., Ortega, F. J., Fernández, M., & Cantador, I. (2016) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31413-6_7 · Cited by 14
Psycholinguistic Features for Deceptive Role Detection in Werewolf
Girlea, C., Gîrju, R., & Eyal Amir, A. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1047 · Cited by 13
Web Mining: Opinion and Feedback Analysis for Educational Institutions
PrakashVerma, J., Patel, B., & Patel, A. M. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/14579-2800 · Cited by 13
Extracting Topic-related Opinions and their Targets in NTCIR-7.
Kim, Y., Kim, S., & Myaeng, S.-H. (2008) · Cited by 13
Modeling Review Spam Using Temporal Patterns and Co-bursting BehaviorsPreprint
Li, H., Fei, G., Wang, S., Liu, B., Shao, W., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.06625 · Cited by 20
Self-citationExtended Recommendation Framework: Generating the Text of a User Review as a Personalized SummaryPreprint
Poussevin, M., Guigue, V., & Gallinari, P. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.5448 · Cited by 13
A Hybridized Approach for Enhanced Fake Review Detection
Xu, S., Cuan, H., Yin, Z., & Yin, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3411635 · Cited by 15
Fake Review Detection using Classification
Neha, S., & Anala, A. (2018) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2018917316 · Cited by 12
Fake Reviewer Group Detection in Online Review Systems
Cao, C., Li, S., Yu, S., & Chen, Z. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00122 · Cited by 15
Aspect Oriented Sentiment Analysis on Customer Reviews on Restaurant Using the LDA and BERT Method
Lohith, C., Chandramouli, H., Balasingam, U., & Kumar, S. A. (2023) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01634-8 · Cited by 14
Detecting Professional Spam Reviewers
Huang, J., Qian, T., He, G., Zhong, M., & Peng, Q. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-53917-6_26 · Cited by 12
Ordering adverbs by their scaling effect on adjective intensity
Ruppenhofer, J., Brandes, J., Steiner, P., & Wiegand, M. (2015) · ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) · Cited by 12
Beyond mean rating: Probabilistic aggregation of star ratings based on helpfulness
Tay, W., Zhang, X., & Karimi, S. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24297 · Cited by 12
Catch Me if I Can: Detecting Strategic Behaviour in Peer Assessment
Stelmakh, I., Shah, N. B., & Singh, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16611 · Cited by 14
Adaptive subjective triggers for opinionated document retrieval
Seki, K., & Uehara, K. (2009) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/1498759.1498805 · Cited by 12
Detecting Linkedin Spammers and its Spam Nets
M., V. ́., A´, M., & Cacheda, F. (2013) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2013.040930 · Cited by 12
A new web personalization decision-support artifact for utility-sensitive customer review analysis
Flory, L., Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Thomas, M. A. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.11.003 · Cited by 13
Improving item-based recommendation accuracy with user's preferences on Apache Mahout
Jabakji, A., & Dağ, H. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840789 · Cited by 12
A fuzzy approach to detect spammer groups
Do, Q. N. T., Hussain, F. K., & Nguyen, B. T. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2017.8015478 · Cited by 12
Sentiment Detection, Recognition and Aspect Identification
Faiz, S., & Dahab, M. Y. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2017915675 · Cited by 12
Cyber Social Media Analytics and Issues: A Pragmatic Approach for Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Sharma, S., & Jain, A. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6861-5_41 · Cited by 12
Sadman, N., Gupta, K. D., Haque, A., Poudyal, S., & Sen, S. (2020) · International Conference on E-Business and Applications (ICEBA) · doi:10.1145/3387263.3387272 · Cited by 12
An overview of soft computing techniques on Review Spam Detection
Amin, I., & Dubey, M. K. (2021) · International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM) · doi:10.1109/iciem51511.2021.9445280 · Cited by 12
Improved Fake Reviews Detection Model Based on Vertical Ensemble Tri-Training and Active Learning
Yin, C., Cuan, H., Zhu, Y., & Yin, Z. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3450285 · Cited by 12
Zhong, M., Qu, X., Chen, Y.-H., Liao, S., & Xiao, Q. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/7475022 · Cited by 12
RetractedOpinion spam detection using Deep Learning
Bathla, G., & Kumar, A. (2021) · International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) · doi:10.1109/spin52536.2021.9566048 · Cited by 12
Detecting Fake Reviews of Hype About Restaurants by Sentiment Analysis
Chen, R. Y., Guo, J. Y., & Deng, X. L. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11538-2_3 · Cited by 12
Sentiment retrieval on web reviews using spontaneous natural speech
Pereira, J. C., Luque, J., & Anguera, X. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6854470 · Cited by 12
GANs for Semi-Supervised Opinion Spam Detection
Stanton, G., & Irissappane, A. A. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/723 · Cited by 14
Aoki, T., & Matsui, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108735 · Cited by 15
Li, L., Zheng, H., Chen, D., & Zhu, B. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09571-7 · Cited by 11
Detecting Spam Reviews on Vietnamese E-Commerce Websites
Dinh, C. V., Luu, S. T., & Nguyen, A. G.-T. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21743-2_48 · Cited by 14
A Study on Fake Review Detection Based on RoBERTa and Behavioral Features
Liu, J., Quan, P., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.131 · Cited by 11
Semi-Supervised Based Bangla Fake Review Detection: A Comparative Analysis
Absar, N., Mahmud, T., Hanip, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2025) · International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/icict64420.2025.11005278 · Cited by 11
O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2015) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.999751 · Cited by 14
Contextual Sequential Pattern Mining
Rabatel, J., Bringay, S., & Pascal Poncelet, B. (2010) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2010.182 · Cited by 11
Online Review Spam Detection using Language Model and Feature Selection
S.Patil, M., & Bagade, A. M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/9562-4031 · Cited by 12
Overview of Web Spammer Detection
Mo, Q., & Yang, K. (2014) · Cited by 12
Helping consumers to overcome information overload with a diversified online review subset
Jin, Z., Zhangwen, W., & Naichen, N. (2019) · Frontiers of Business Research in China · doi:10.1186/s11782-019-0062-1 · Cited by 11
A Study on Identification of Important Features for Efficient Detection of Fake Reviews
Lin, T.-Y., Chakraborty, B., & Peng, C. (2021) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi53623.2021.9655845 · Cited by 11
Detection of Chinese Deceptive Reviews Based on Pre-Trained Language Model
Weng, C.-H., Lin, K.-C., & Ying, J. J.-C. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12073338 · Cited by 11
Fake Reviews Classification using Deep Learning
Ashraf, S., Rehman, F. U., Sharif, H., Kirn, H., Arshad, H., & Manzoor, H. (2023) · International Multi-disciplinary Conference in Emerging Research Trends (IMCERT) · doi:10.1109/imcert57083.2023.10075156 · Cited by 12
Detecting Fake Reviews in Google Maps—A Case Study
Gryka, P., & Janicki, A. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13106331 · Cited by 11
Next-Word Prediction: A Perspective of Energy-Aware Distributed Inference
Wang, S., Shao, Z., & Lui, J. C. S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2023.3310536 · Cited by 12
Munzel, A. (2015) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/0767370115584314 · Cited by 12
Load balancing for partition-based similarity search
Tang, X., Alabduljalil, M., Jin, X., & Yang, T. (2014) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2600428.2609624 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of Data Mining Features, Features Taxonomies and their Applications
Noekhah, S., Salim, N. B., & Zakaria, N. H. (2017) · Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research · doi:10.24017/science.2017.3.3 · Cited by 11
Estimating the Rating of the Reviews Based on the Text
Kavousi, M., & Saadatmand, S. (2018) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2514-4_22 · Cited by 11
Leveraging Product Characteristics for Online Collusive Detection in Big Data Transactions
Luo, S., & Wan, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2891907 · Cited by 11
Robustness of Word and Character N-gram Combinations in Detecting Deceptive and Truthful Opinions
Siagian, A. H. A. M., & Aritsugi, M. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3349536 · Cited by 11
Improving Explainable Recommendations by Deep Review-Based Explanations
Ouyang, S., & Lawlor, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076146 · Cited by 11
An Exploratory Analysis on the Unfold of Fake News During COVID-19 Pandemic
Gupta, A., Bansal, A., Mamgain, K., & Gupta, A. (2021) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2877-1_24 · Cited by 11
Non parametric statistical models for on-line text classification
Cerchiello, P., & Giudici, P. (2012) · Advances in Data Analysis and Classification · doi:10.1007/s11634-012-0122-2 · Cited by 11
Effectiveness of web search results for genre and sentiment classification
Na, J., & Thet, T. T. (2009) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551509104233 · Cited by 11
Opinion Spam Recognition Method for Online Reviews using Ontological Features
Long, N. H., Nghia, P. H. T., & Vuong, N. M. (2018) · Tạp chí Khoa học · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.11024 · Cited by 13
Mining Weak Relations Between Reviews for Opinion Spam Detection
Xu, Y., Liu, H., Ge, J., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Lv, H., Shi, H., & Zhou, W. J. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3221008 · Cited by 10
Bengali Fake Review Detection using Semi-supervised Generative Adversarial Networks
Shawon, M. T. R., Shahariar, G. M., Shah, F. M., Alam, M. S., & Mahbub, M. S. (2023) · doi:10.1109/icnlp58431.2023.00011 · Cited by 13
Deceptive opinion spam detection using feature reduction techniques
Maurya, S. K., Singh, D., & Maurya, A. K. (2023) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-023-02208-4 · Cited by 10
Leveraging Stacking Framework for Fake Review Detection in the Hospitality Sector
Ashraf, S. A., Javed, A. F., Bellary, S., Bala, P. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19020075 · Cited by 12
Review Authorship Attribution in a Similarity Space
Qian, T., Liu, B., Li, Q., & Si, J. (2015) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-015-1513-6 · Cited by 10
Self-citationOpinion mining framework using proposed RB-bayes model for text classication
Bhalla, R., & Bagga, A. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · doi:10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp477-484 · Cited by 10
Understanding Users’ Satisfaction towards Public Transit System in India: A Case-Study of Mumbai
Das, R. D. (2021) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi10030155 · Cited by 10
If a Picture is Worth 1000 Words, Is a Word Worth 1000 Features for Design Metric Estimation?
Edwards, K. M., Peng, A., Miller, S. R., & Ahmed, F. (2021) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4053130 · Cited by 10
A hierarchical neural network model with user and product attention for deceptive reviews detection
Ren, Y., Yan, M., & Ji, D. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.011 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Jindal, N., & Liu, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Liu, Bing
- Venue
- Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 219
- OpenAlex
- W2047756776
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 77
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- opinion spam, spam detection, product reviews, online reviews, review aggregation, Amazon reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review