The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion spam and analysis
Abstract
Evaluative texts on the Web have become a valuable source of opinions on products, services, events, individuals, etc. Recently, many researchers have studied such opinion sources as product reviews, forum posts, and blogs. However, existing research has been focused on classification and summarization of opinions using natural language processing and data mining techniques. An important issue that has been neglected so far is opinion spam or trustworthiness of online opinions. In this paper, we study this issue in the context of product reviews, which are opinion rich and are widely used by consumers and product manufacturers. In the past two years, several startup companies also appeared which aggregate opinions from product reviews. It is thus high time to study spam in reviews. To the best of our knowledge, there is still no published study on this topic, although Web spam and email spam have been investigated extensively. We will see that opinion spam is quite different from Web spam and email spam, and thus requires different detection techniques. Based on the analysis of 5.8 million reviews and 2.14 million reviewers from amazon.com, we show that opinion spam in reviews is widespread. This paper analyzes such spam activities and presents some novel techniques to detect them
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Disinformation can take forms beyond the production of hoaxes or “fake news” (Lazer et al., 2018); and include other types of manipulation of social systems, such as Google bombs to associate a keyword to a URL by repeatedly searching for the keyword and clicking on the URL, or review spam (Jindal and Liu, 2008) to manipulate the reputation of a product/service.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Jindal and Liu, 2008
Citations
Cites
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Self-citationThumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02 · doi:10.3115/1118693.1118704 · Cited by 7,024
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,646
Turney, P. D. (2001) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073153 · Cited by 2,354
Dave, K. S., Lawrence, S., & Pennock, D. M. (2003) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/775152.775226 · Cited by 1,925
On the resemblance and containment of documents
Broder, A. (2002) · Compression and Complexity of Sequences (SEQUENCES) · doi:10.1109/sequen.1997.666900 · Cited by 1,818
Extracting product features and opinions from reviews
Popescu, A.-M., & Etzioni, O. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220618 · Cited by 1,714
A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail
Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D. E., & Horvitz, E. (1998) · Cited by 1,212
Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2718 · Cited by 1,181
Mining the Web: Discovering Knowledge from Hypertext Data
Chakrabarti, S. (2002) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 696
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,002
A generic approach to generate opinion lists of phrases for opinion mining applications
Rill, S., Scheidt, J., Drescher, J., Schütz, O., Reinel, D., & Wogenstein, F. (2012) · International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining (WISDOM) · doi:10.1145/2346676.2346683 · Cited by 30
b-bit minwise hashing for estimating three-way similarities
Li, P., König, A. C., & Gui, W. (2010) · Cited by 30
Streaming Analysis of Discourse Participants
Durme, B. V. (2013) · Cited by 30
A Novel User-based Spam Review Detection
Bajaj, S., Garg, N., & Singh, S. K. (2017) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.467 · Cited by 30
Spam Review Detection Using Ensemble Machine Learning
Mani, S., Kumari, S., Jain, A., & Kumar, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96133-0_15 · Cited by 30
A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for the Credibility Assessment of User-Generated Content
Jain, P. K., Pamula, R., & Ansari, S. (2021) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-021-08136-5 · Cited by 29
Impact of Sentiment Analysis in Fake Online Review Detection
Hassan, R., & Islam, M. R. (2021) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development (ICICT4SD) · doi:10.1109/icict4sd50815.2021.9396899 · Cited by 34
Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Fake Review Detection with Emphasis on SVM
Naresh, P., Pavan, S. V. N., Mohammed, A. R., Chanti, N., & Tharun, M. (2023) · International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS) · doi:10.1109/icscss57650.2023.10169190 · Cited by 37
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2016) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551515625027 · Cited by 32
Deriving User Preferences of Mobile Apps from Their Management Activities
Liu, X., Ai, W., Li, H., Tang, J., Huang, G., Feng, F., & Mei, Q. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3015462 · Cited by 30
Feature Selection as Causal Inference: Experiments with Text Classification
Paul, M. J. (2017) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k17-1018 · Cited by 40
The Effects of Features Selection Methods on Spam Review Detection Performance
Etaiwi, W., & Awajan, A. (2017) · International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS) · doi:10.1109/ictcs.2017.50 · Cited by 31
On the hardness of evading combinations of linear classifiers
Stevens, D., & Lowd, D. (2013) · ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (AISec) · doi:10.1145/2517312.2517318 · Cited by 29
Walther, M., Jakobi, T., Watson, S. J., & Stevens, G. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100278 · Cited by 33
Opinion mining in higher education: a corpus-based approach
Grljević, O., Bošnjak, Z., & Kovačević, A. (2020) · Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.1080/17517575.2020.1773542 · Cited by 29
A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Detect Fake Online Reviews
Hassan, R., & Islam, M. R. (2020) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit51783.2020.9392727 · Cited by 28
An approach to rank reviews by fusing and mining opinions based on review pertinence
Wang, J., Yan, Z., Yang, L. T., & Huang, B. (2014) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2014.04.002 · Cited by 29
Review spam detection using active learning
Ahsan, M. N. I., Nahian, T., Kafi, A. A., Hossain, M. I., & Shah, F. M. (2016) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2016.7746279 · Cited by 30
Collusion-aware detection of review spammers in location based social networks
Cao, J., Xia, R., Guo, Y., & Ma, Z. (2018) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-018-0614-x · Cited by 30
Feature-based transfer learning with real-world applications
Pan, S. J. (2010) · doi:10.14711/thesis-b1118218 · Cited by 30
Evaluation of an algorithm for aspect-based opinion mining using a lexicon-based approach
Wogenstein, F., Drescher, J., Reinel, D., Rill, S., & Scheidt, J. (2013) · International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining (WISDOM) · doi:10.1145/2502069.2502074 · Cited by 28
Information Retrieval in the Commentsphere
Potthast, M., Stein, B., Loose, F., & Becker, S. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2337542.2337553 · Cited by 28
Optimizing parallel algorithms for all pairs similarity search
Alabduljalil, M., Tang, X., & Yang, T. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2433396.2433422 · Cited by 28
Li, H., Ai, W., Liu, X., Tang, J., Huang, G., Feng, F., & Mei, Q. (2016) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2872427.2874814 · Cited by 28
A comparative empirical study on social media sentiment analysis over various genres and languages
Hangya, V., & Farkas, R. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-016-9489-3 · Cited by 28
Identifying Indicators of Fake Reviews Based on Spammer's Behavior Features
Liu, P., Xu, Z. “., Ai, J., & Wang, F. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) · doi:10.1109/qrs-c.2017.72 · Cited by 29
Cheng, L., Hu, H.-W., & Wu, C. (2021) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2021030104 · Cited by 29
Automatic sentiment extraction from YouTube videos
Kaushik, L., Sangwan, A., & Hansen, J. H. L. (2013) · IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru.2013.6707736 · Cited by 28
Large, huge or gigantic? Identifying and encoding intensity relations among adjectives in WordNet
Sheinman, V., Fellbaum, C., Julien, I., Schulam, P., & Tokunaga, T. (2013) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-012-9212-1 · Cited by 28
An ensemble approach to detect review spam using hybrid machine learning technique
Ahsan, M. N. I., Nahian, T., Kafi, A. A., Hossain, M. I., & Shah, F. M. (2016) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccitechn.2016.7860229 · Cited by 30
Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Li, F., Seo, H., & Pluretti, R. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom.2015.440 · Cited by 29
Review Spam Detection Using Opinion Mining
Narayan, R., Rout, J. K., & Jena, S. K. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3376-6_30 · Cited by 28
Wang, L., Niu, J., Song, H. H., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.11.001 · Cited by 27
Detection of Telephony Spam and Scams using Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Algorithm
Gowri, S. M., Ramana, G. S., Ranjani, M. S., & Tharani, T. (2021) · International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) · doi:10.1109/icaccs51430.2021.9441982 · Cited by 27
Competing with the Sharing Economy: Incumbents’ Reaction on Review Manipulation
Nie, C., Zheng, Z., & Sarkar, S. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/15666 · Cited by 27
A study of manipulative and authentic negative reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) · doi:10.1145/2557977.2557984 · Cited by 28
Detecting collusive spammers in online review communities
Xu, C. (2013) · Ph.D. Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/2513166.2513176 · Cited by 29
Capturing Word Choice Patterns with LDA for Fake Review Detection in Sentiment Analysis
Lee, K. D., Han, K.-A., & Myaeng, S.-H. (2016) · International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics · doi:10.1145/2912845.2912868 · Cited by 27
Aspect-based opinion mining in online reviews
Moghaddam, S. (2013) · Cited by 27
Tri-Training for Authorship Attribution with Limited Training Data
Qian, T., Liu, B., Chen, L., & Peng, Z. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-2057 · Cited by 26
Self-citationOh, Y. W., & Park, C. H. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764219878238 · Cited by 26
Graph Learning for Fake Review Detection
Yu, S., Ren, J. F., Li, S., Naseriparsa, M., & Xia, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.922589 · Cited by 30
A comprehensive survey of various methods in opinion spam detection
Mewada, A., & Dewang, R. K. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13702-5 · Cited by 32
A Weighted Stacking Ensemble Model With Sampling for Fake Reviews Detection
Singhal, R., & Kashef, R. F. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3268548 · Cited by 28
Lu, J., Zhan, X., Liu, G., Zhan, X., & Deng, X. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12102165 · Cited by 30
Classifying web review opinions for consumer product analysis
Yang, C. C., Wong, Y. C., & Wei, C. (2009) · International Conference on Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1145/1593254.1593263 · Cited by 26
Iterative sampling based frequent itemset mining for big data
Wu, X., Fan, W., Peng, J., Zhang, K., & Yu, Y. H. (2015) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-015-0345-6 · Cited by 26
Comparing methods for deriving intensity scores for adjectives
Ruppenhofer, J., Wiegand, M., & Brandes, J. (2014) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/e14-4023 · Cited by 26
A Review on Challenging Issues in Arabic Sentiment Analysis
Hamdi, A., Shaban, K. B., & Zainal, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.3844/jcssp.2016.471.481 · Cited by 26
Research on product review analysis and spam review detection
Chauhan, S. K., Goel, A., Goel, P., Chauhan, A., & Gurve, M. K. (2017) · International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) · doi:10.1109/spin.2017.8049980 · Cited by 26
Detecting Crowdturfing "Add to Favorites" Activities in Online Shopping
Su, N., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186079 · Cited by 26
Review spam detection using machine learning
Radovanovic, D., & Krstajić, B. (2018) · International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT) · doi:10.1109/spit.2018.8350457 · Cited by 27
Spotting review spammer groups: A cosine pattern and network based method
Zhang, L., He, G., Cao, J., Zhu, H., & Xu, B. (2018) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.4686 · Cited by 26
Munzel, A. (2015) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570715604155 · Cited by 24
Noise-tolerance matrix completion for location recommendation
Xia, B., Li, T., Li, Q., & Zhang, H. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-017-0516-z · Cited by 25
Exploiting Usage to Predict Instantaneous App Popularity
Sigg, S., Lagerspetz, E., Peltonen, E., Nurmi, P., & Tarkoma, S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3199677 · Cited by 34
EthReview: An Ethereum-based Product Review System for Mitigating Rating Frauds
Zulfiqar, M., Tariq, F., Janjua, M. U., Mian, A. N., Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., Sher, F., & Hassan, M. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.102094 · Cited by 25
Wang, N., Yang, J., Kong, X., & Gao, Y. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116207 · Cited by 25
ScoreGAN: A Fraud Review Detector Based on Regulated GAN With Data Augmentation
Shehnepoor, S., Togneri, R. B., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3139771 · Cited by 38
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103409 · Cited by 27
Frauds in Online Social Networks: A Review
Apte, M. M., Palshikar, G. K., & Baskaran, S. (2018) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78256-0_1 · Cited by 26
Detection of spam tipping behaviour on foursquare
Aggarwal, A., Almeida, J. M., & Kumaraguru, P. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2487788.2488015 · Cited by 25
Estimating the Prevalence of Deception in Online Review CommunitiesPreprint
Ott, M., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1204.2804 · Cited by 25
Designing a deep learning-based application for detecting fake online reviews
Thảo, L. Q., Kien, D. T., Thuy, D. T. T., Thuy, L. T. M., Bach, N. C., Duc, T. X., Bach, H. G., & Cuong, D. D. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108708 · Cited by 26
Wani, M. A., ELAffendi, M. A., & Shakil, K. A. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13100264 · Cited by 31
Fake or real? The computational detection of online deceptive text
Ball, L., & Elworthy, J. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/jma.2014.15 · Cited by 24
To catch a fake: Curbing deceptive Yelp ratings and venues
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., & Chau, D. H. (2015) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11264 · Cited by 26
Semi-Supervised Learning Based Fake Review Detection
Deng, H., Zhao, L., Luo, N., Liu, Y., Guo, G., Wang, X., Tan, Z., Wang, S., & Zhou, F. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa/iucc.2017.00195 · Cited by 24
Opinion Spam Detection in Online Reviews Using Neural Networks
Archchitha, K., & Charles, E. Y. A. (2019) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter48817.2019.9023695 · Cited by 23
Detecting and Characterizing Extremist Reviewer Groups in Online Product Reviews
Gupta, V., Aggarwal, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2988098 · Cited by 26
Explaining consumer suspicion: insights of a vignette study on online product reviews
Kollmer, T., Eckhardt, A., & Reibenspiess, V. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00549-9 · Cited by 26
Catelli, R., Bevilacqua, L., Mariniello, N., di Carlo, V. S., Magaldi, M., Fujita, H., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3277490 · Cited by 25
Turning the Tide: Curbing Deceptive Yelp Behaviors
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., Burri, G. J., & Chau, D. H. (2014) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611973440.28 · Cited by 24
Product review management software based on multiple classifiers
Catal, C., & Guldan, S. (2017) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0137 · Cited by 23
An analysis of 14 Million tweets on hashtag‐oriented spamming*
Sedhai, S., & Sun, A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23836 · Cited by 25
Content-Aware Trust Propagation Toward Online Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Wang, Q., Luo, B., Seo, H., & Li, F. (2019) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3305258 · Cited by 24
Spam Detection in Reviews Using LSTM-Based Multi-Entity Temporal Features
Xiang, L., Guo, G., Li, Q., Zhu, C., Chen, J., & Ma, H. (2020) · Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing · doi:10.32604/iasc.2020.013382 · Cited by 23
Para 'Normal' Activity: On the Distribution of Average Ratings
Dalvi, N. N., Kumar, R., & Pang, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14427 · Cited by 23
Learning user credibility for product ranking
Zhang, R., Gao, M. Z., He, X., & Zhou, A. (2015) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-015-0880-1 · Cited by 23
Classification of deceptive opinions using a low dimensionality representation
Cagnina, L., & Rosso, P. (2015) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-2909 · Cited by 23
CoSpa: A Co-training Approach for Spam Review Identification with Support Vector Machine
Zhang, W., Bu, C., Yoshida, T., & Zhang, S. (2016) · Information · doi:10.3390/info7010012 · Cited by 23
Improved Consistent Weighted Sampling Revisited
Wu, W., Li, B., Chen, L., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876250 · Cited by 22
The effect of aggregation methods on sentiment classification in Persian reviews
Basiri, M. E., Kabiri, A., Abdar, M., Mashwani, W. K., Yen, N. Y., & Hung, J. C.-S. (2019) · Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.1080/17517575.2019.1669829 · Cited by 23
Text sentiment analysis using frequency-based vigorous features
Razzaq, A., Asim, M., Ali, Z., Qadri, S., Mumtaz, I., Khan, D. M., & Niaz, Q. (2019) · China Communications · doi:10.23919/jcc.2019.12.011 · Cited by 23
Effective Opinion Spam Detection: A Study on Review Metadata Versus Content
Rastogi, A., Mehrotra, M., & Ali, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2020-0013 · Cited by 24
Detecting fake review intentions in the review context: A multimodal deep learning approach
Hou, J., Tan, Z., Zhang, S., Hu, Q., & Wang, P. (2025) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101485 · Cited by 28
eWOM Watchdogs: Ego‐Threatening Product Domains and the Policing of Positive Online Reviews
Larson, L. R. L., & Denton, L. T. (2014) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20735 · Cited by 22
Opinion Spammer Detection in Web Forum
Chen, Y., & Chen, H. (2015) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767766 · Cited by 22
Opinion Spam Detection Using Feature Selection
Patel, R., & Thakkar, P. (2014) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn.2014.127 · Cited by 22
Opinion Spam Detection Based on Heterogeneous Information Network
Sun, Y., & Loparo, K. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2019.00277 · Cited by 21
Rejection Sampling for Weighted Jaccard Similarity Revisited
Li, X., & Li, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16543 · Cited by 22
A Statistical Approach to Star Rating Classification of Sentiment
Hogenboom, A., Boon, F., & Frăsincar, F. (2012) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30864-2_24 · Cited by 22
Seneviratne, S., Seneviratne, A. P., Kâafar, M. A., Mahanti, A., & Mohapatra, P. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3007901 · Cited by 22
Feng, N., Su, Z., Li, D., Zheng, C., & Li, M. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.05.012 · Cited by 22
SPAR: A system to detect spam in Arabic opinions
Wahsheh, H. A., Al-Kabi, M. N., & Alsmadi, I. M. (2013) · IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies · doi:10.1109/aeect.2013.6716442 · Cited by 23
BERT-Based Deceptive Review Detection in Social Media: Introducing DeceptiveBERT
Hyder, S. B., Tariq, N., Moqurrab, S. A., Ashraf, M. I., Yoo, J., & Srivastava, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3403937 · Cited by 24
Is Your Anchor Going Up or Down? Fast and Accurate Supervised Topic Models
Nguyen, T., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Lund, J., Seppi, K. D., & Ringger, E. K. (2015) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1076 · Cited by 21
Sentiment Classification Using Negation as a Proxy for Negative Sentiment.
Ohana, B., Tierney, B., & Delany, S. J. (2016) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · Cited by 21
Detecting Collusive Spamming Activities in Community Question Answering
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, K., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052594 · Cited by 21
Analyzing cloud based reviews for product ranking using feature based clustering algorithm
Gobi, N., & Rathinavelu, A. (2018) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-018-1996-3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jindal, N., & Liu, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Liu, Bing
- Venue
- Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 219
- OpenAlex
- W2047756776
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 77
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- opinion spam, spam detection, product reviews, online reviews, review aggregation, Amazon reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
