The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion spam and analysis
Abstract
Evaluative texts on the Web have become a valuable source of opinions on products, services, events, individuals, etc. Recently, many researchers have studied such opinion sources as product reviews, forum posts, and blogs. However, existing research has been focused on classification and summarization of opinions using natural language processing and data mining techniques. An important issue that has been neglected so far is opinion spam or trustworthiness of online opinions. In this paper, we study this issue in the context of product reviews, which are opinion rich and are widely used by consumers and product manufacturers. In the past two years, several startup companies also appeared which aggregate opinions from product reviews. It is thus high time to study spam in reviews. To the best of our knowledge, there is still no published study on this topic, although Web spam and email spam have been investigated extensively. We will see that opinion spam is quite different from Web spam and email spam, and thus requires different detection techniques. Based on the analysis of 5.8 million reviews and 2.14 million reviewers from amazon.com, we show that opinion spam in reviews is widespread. This paper analyzes such spam activities and presents some novel techniques to detect them
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Disinformation can take forms beyond the production of hoaxes or “fake news” (Lazer et al., 2018); and include other types of manipulation of social systems, such as Google bombs to associate a keyword to a URL by repeatedly searching for the keyword and clicking on the URL, or review spam (Jindal and Liu, 2008) to manipulate the reputation of a product/service.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Jindal and Liu, 2008
Citations
Cites
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Self-citationThumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02 · doi:10.3115/1118693.1118704 · Cited by 7,024
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,646
Turney, P. D. (2001) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073153 · Cited by 2,354
Dave, K. S., Lawrence, S., & Pennock, D. M. (2003) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/775152.775226 · Cited by 1,925
On the resemblance and containment of documents
Broder, A. (2002) · Compression and Complexity of Sequences (SEQUENCES) · doi:10.1109/sequen.1997.666900 · Cited by 1,818
Extracting product features and opinions from reviews
Popescu, A.-M., & Etzioni, O. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220618 · Cited by 1,714
A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail
Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D. E., & Horvitz, E. (1998) · Cited by 1,212
Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2718 · Cited by 1,181
Mining the Web: Discovering Knowledge from Hypertext Data
Chakrabarti, S. (2002) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 696
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,002
Automatic generation of short informative sentiment summaries
Glaser, A., & Schütze, H. (2012) · Cited by 7
Co-training on authorship attribution with very fewlabeled examples
Qian, T., Liu, B., Zhong, M., & He, G. (2014) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2600428.2609470 · Cited by 7
Self-citationRobust crowd bias correction via dual knowledge transfer from multiple overlapping sources
Xie, S., Hu, Q., Zhang, J., Gao, J., Fan, W., & Yu, P. S. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2015.7363827 · Cited by 7
Using Boosting Approaches to Detect Spam Reviews
Ahmed, S., & Shah, F. M. (2019) · International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT) · doi:10.1109/icasert.2019.8934467 · Cited by 7
Duma, R. A., Niu, Z., Nyamawe, A. S., & Manjotho, A. A. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128097 · Cited by 7
Jang, M., Lee, S., & Baek, H. (2024) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-06-2023-0375 · Cited by 7
Building and managing reputation in the environment of Chinese e-commerce
Duan, H., & Liu, F. (2012) · International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics · doi:10.1145/2254129.2254183 · Cited by 7
A parameterized approach to deal with sock puppets
Gera, T., & Singh, J. (2015) · International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/c3it.2015.7060150 · Cited by 7
A Regularized Recommendation Algorithm with Probabilistic Sentiment-Ratings
Peleja, F., Dias, P. I. R. C., & Magalhães, J. (2012) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2012.113 · Cited by 7
Chinese Review Spam Classification Using Machine Learning Method
Xi, Y. (2012) · International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology · doi:10.1109/iccect.2012.200 · Cited by 7
Semi-SGD: Semi-Supervised Learning Based Spammer Group Detection in Product Reviews
Zhang, L., Yang, Y. W., Wu, Z., & Cao, J. (2017) · International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data · doi:10.1109/cbd.2017.70 · Cited by 7
Adapting Topic Models using Lexical Associations with Tree Priors
Yang, W., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Resnik, P. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1203 · Cited by 7
SpamTracer: Manual Fake Review Detection for O2O Commercial Platforms by Using Geolocation Features
Deng, R., Ruan, N., Jin, R., Lu, Y., Weijia Jia, B., Su, C., & Xu, D. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14234-6_21 · Cited by 7
Automatic generation of lexica for sentiment polarity shifters
Schulder, M., Wiegand, M., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2020) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s135132492000039x · Cited by 7
Sentiment Analysis of Arabic Documents
Rahab, H., Djoudi, M., & Zitouni, A. (2020) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4240-8.ch013 · Cited by 7
Hybrid ensemble and soft computing approaches for review spam detection on different spam datasets
Amin, I., & Dubey, M. K. (2022) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.342 · Cited by 7
Detection of spam reviews using hybrid grey wolf optimizer clustering method
Shringi, S., & Sharma, H. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-12848-6 · Cited by 7
Fake online review recognition algorithm and optimisation research based on deep learning
Hou, J., & Zhu, A. (2022) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns.2021.2.00170 · Cited by 7
Detecting Deceptive Utterances Using Deep Pre-Trained Neural Networks
Wawer, A., & Sarzyńska‐Wawer, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12125878 · Cited by 7
Fake Review Identification Methods Based on Multidimensional Feature Engineering
Wang, G., Shang, G., Pu, P., Li, X., & Peng, H. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/5229277 · Cited by 8
Detecting fraudulent online Yelp reviews using K-L divergence and linguistic features
Harris, C. G. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.075 · Cited by 8
Hayati, P., & Potdar, V. M. (2012) · International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics · doi:10.4018/jdcf.2012010102 · Cited by 7
A roadmap of sentiment analysis and its research directions
Kaur, S., & Mohana, R. (2015) · International Journal of Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1504/ijkl.2015.073485 · Cited by 8
Temporal mechanisms of polarization in online reviews
Matakos, A., & Tsaparas, P. (2016) · Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.5555/3192424.3192523 · Cited by 7
Review authenticity verification using supervised learning and reviewer personality traits
Christopher, S. L., & Rahulnath, H. A. (2016) · International Conference on Emerging Technological Trends · doi:10.1109/icett.2016.7873647 · Cited by 8
Guo, B., Wang, H., Yu, Z., & Sun, Y. T. (2017) · International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1109/cits.2017.8035320 · Cited by 7
Try to Find Fake Reviews with Semantic and Relational Discovery
Runa, D., Zhang, X., & Zhai, Y. (2017) · International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid (SKG) · doi:10.1109/skg.2017.00048 · Cited by 8
Trojan Horses in Amazon's Castle: Understanding the Incentivized Online Reviews
Jamshidi, S., Rejaie, R., & Li, J. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508267 · Cited by 6
Detection of Review Abuse via Semi-Supervised Binary Multi-Target Tensor Decomposition
Yelundur, A. R., Chaoji, V. S., & Mishra, B. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330678 · Cited by 7
Detecting Spam Emails/SMS Using Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and Random Forest
Goswami, V., Malviya, V., & Sharma, P. (2020) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38040-3_69 · Cited by 7
Towards Linking Camouflaged Descriptions to Implicit Products in E-commerce
Huang, L., Bo, Y., Zhang, R., & Lu, Q. (2020) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401067 · Cited by 6
Opinion Spam Detection based on Supervised Sentiment Analysis Approach
Nejad, S. J., Ahmadi-Abkenari, F., & Bayat, P. (2020) · International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1109/iccke50421.2020.9303677 · Cited by 7
Exploring and Detecting Opinion Spam on Social Media
Xiao, Y., & Qiu, J. (2020) · Chinese Automation Congress · doi:10.1109/cac51589.2020.9327093 · Cited by 7
TWO-STEP MODEL FOR EMOTION DETECTION ON TWITTER USERS: A COVID-19 CASE STUDY IN MALAYSIA
Razak, C. S. A., Hamid, S. H. A., Meon, H., Subramaniam, H., & Anuar, N. B. (2021) · Malaysian Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.22452/mjcs.vol34no4.4 · Cited by 9
An Efficient Ensemble approach for Fake Reviews Detection
Iqbal, A., Rauf, M. A., Zubair, M., & Younis, T. (2023) · doi:10.1109/icai58407.2023.10136652 · Cited by 7
A Methodological Template to Construct Ground Truth of Authentic and Fake Online Reviews
Banerjee, S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2018.00083 · Cited by 7
Mining revenue-maximizing bundling configuration
Do, L., Lauw, H. W., & Wang, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2735479.2735491 · Cited by 7
The Role of the Underground Economy in Social Network Spam and Abuse
Thomas, K. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Sovereignty of the Apps: There's more to Relevance than DownloadsPreprint
Sigg, S., Lagerspetz, E., Peltonen, E., Nurmi, P., & Tarkoma, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.10161 · Cited by 7
Shehnepoor, S., Togneri, R. B., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.06561 · Cited by 7
Fake reviews detection in e-commerce using machine learning techniques: A comparative survey
Jalal, M., & Hussein, M. H. (2024) · BIO Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/bioconf/20249700099 · Cited by 12
Metadata Integration for Spam Reviews Detection on Vietnamese E-Commerce Websites
Dinh, C. V., & Luu, S. T. (2024) · International Journal of Asian Language Processing · doi:10.1142/s2717554524500024 · Cited by 6
Al-Zoubi, A. M., Mora, A. M., Faris, H., & Qaddoura, R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128160 · Cited by 6
BILD Testing for Spotting Out Suspicious Reviews, Suspicious Reviewers and Group Spammers
Gera, T., Thakur, D. S., & Singh, J. (2015) · International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies · doi:10.1109/csnt.2015.138 · Cited by 7
Mining collective knowledge: inferring functional labels from online review for business
Fan, F., Zhao, W. X., Wen, J.-R., Xu, G., & Chang, E. Y. (2017) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1050-4 · Cited by 6
Composite Sequential Modeling for Identifying Fake Reviews
Bhargava, R., Baoni, A., & Sharma, Y. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1515/jisys-2017-0501 · Cited by 6
A Spam Review Detection Method by Verifying Consistency among Multiple Review Sites
Yao, C., Wang, J., & Kodama, E. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2019.00396 · Cited by 6
Борисовна, П. Д., Galitsky, B. A., Taylor, J., & Ozerov, A. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316604 · Cited by 6
Opinion Spam Detection with Attention-Based Neural Networks
Sedighi, Z., Ebrahimpour-Komleh, H., Bagheri, A., & Kosseim, L. (2019) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 6
Fake Product Review Monitoring System
Jain, P., Chheda, K., & Lade, M. J. P. (2019) · International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development · doi:10.31142/ijtsrd21644 · Cited by 6
A novel ILP framework for summarizing content with high lexical variety
Luo, W., Liu, F., Liu, Z., & Litman, D. J. (2018) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324918000323 · Cited by 6
Recommending Inferior Results: A General and Feature-Free Model for Spam Detection
Liu, Y. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411900 · Cited by 7
Qin, C., Zhang, C., & Bu, Y. (2021) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-11-2020-0324 · Cited by 6
Arabic Fake News and Spam Handling: Methods, Resources and Opportunities
Rahab, H., Zitouni, A., & Djoudi, M. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security Systems and Privacy (AI-CSP) · doi:10.1109/ai-csp52968.2021.9671174 · Cited by 6
Liu, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108639286.002 · Cited by 7
Self-citationFake Reviews Detection with Hybrid Features Using Time-Sequential Deep Learning Model
Weng, Y.-L., Chien, S.-Y. J., & Lin, S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms56717.2022.9980627 · Cited by 6
Various approaches to the opinion classification problems solving
Szabó, P. G., & Machová, K. (2012) · IEEE World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) · doi:10.1109/sami.2012.6208929 · Cited by 6
Learning opinions in user-generated web content
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2011) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s135132491100012x · Cited by 6
Finding the hidden hands: a case study of detecting organized posters and promoters in SINA weibo
Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Yu, X., Jia, Y., Zhou, B., & Li, S. (2015) · China Communications · doi:10.1109/cc.2015.7366237 · Cited by 6
Experimental Evaluation of a Lexicon- and Corpus-based Ensemble for Multi-way Sentiment Analysis
Cao, M. D., & Ingrid Zukerman, A. (2012) · Cited by 6
Partitioned Similarity Search with Cache-Conscious Data Traversal
Tang, X., Alabduljalil, M., Jin, X., & Yang, T. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3014060 · Cited by 6
Classification techniques for sentiment discovery-A review
Adinarayana, S., & Ilavarasan, E. (2016) · International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES) · doi:10.1109/scopes.2016.7955860 · Cited by 6
Detecting Spammers in E-Commerce Website via Spectrum Features of User Relation Graph
Guo, B., Wang, H., Yu, Z., & Sun, Y. T. (2017) · International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data · doi:10.1109/cbd.2017.63 · Cited by 6
Chiranjeevi, P., Teja, S. D., & Vishnu Vardhan, B. (2018) · International Journal of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.21817/ijet/2018/v10i1/181001131 · Cited by 7
Research on Opinion Spam Detection by Time Series Anomaly Detection
Wang, Y., Zuo, W., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24274-9_16 · Cited by 7
An Opinion Spam Detection Method Based on Multi-Filters Convolutional Neural Network
Wang, Y., Liu, B., Wu, H., Zhao, S., Cai, Z., Li, D., & Fong, C. C. (2020) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2020.09835 · Cited by 6
Self-citationMarthasari, D., & Widjaja, D. C. (2020) · Jurnal Manajemen Perhotelan · doi:10.9744/jmp.6.1.1-8 · Cited by 6
Improving sentiment analysis efficacy through feature synchronization
Ali, Z., Razzaq, A., Ali, S., Qadri, S., & Zia, A. (2021) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-10383-w · Cited by 6
Detecting Spam Game Reviews on Steam with a Semi-Supervised Approach
Bian, P., Liu, L., & Sweetser, P. (2021) · International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) · doi:10.1145/3472538.3472547 · Cited by 7
Shifting consumers’ sustainable behavior in the hospitality industry
Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V. V., Suryantini, N. P. S., & Polyezhayev, Y. (2021) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202128002001 · Cited by 6
A context-aware approach to detection of short irrelevant texts
Xie, S., Wang, J., Amin, M. S., Yan, B., Bhasin, A., Yu, C. T., & Yu, P. S. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2015.7344831 · Cited by 6
An effective and economic bi-level approach to ranking and rating spam detection
Xie, S., Hu, Q., Zhang, J., & Yu, P. S. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2015.7344794 · Cited by 6
Detecting Internet Hidden Paid Posters Based on Group and Individual Characteristics
Wang, X., Zhou, B., Jia, Y., & Li, S. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26187-4_8 · Cited by 6
Paid review and paid writer detection
Ko, M.-C., Huang, H., & Chen, H. (2017) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3106426.3106433 · Cited by 6
Who Can We Trust: A New Approach for Fraudulent Rater Detection in Reputation Systems
Cai, Y., & Zhu, D. (2020) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12427 · Cited by 6
Evaluation of E-Scooter Media Coverage
Caspi, O., & Smart, M. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.32866/001c.30193 · Cited by 6
One methodology for spam review detection based on review coherence metrics
Yang, X. (2015) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things · doi:10.1109/icaiot.2015.7111547 · Cited by 7
Handling Context in Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis
Moreo, A., Castro, J. L., & Zurita, J. M. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31715-6_27 · Cited by 6
Optimal Design for Social LearningPreprint
Che, Y., & Hörner, J. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.7916/d82f7mkv · Cited by 6
Detecting Sockpuppets in Deceptive Opinion SpamPreprint
Hosseinia, M., & Mukherjee, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.03149 · Cited by 6
Fake Review Detection Using Behavioral and Contextual FeaturesPreprint
Kumar, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.00807 · Cited by 11
Leveraging GPT-2 for Classifying Spam Reviews with Limited Labeled Data via Adversarial TrainingPreprint
Irissappane, A. A., Yu, H., Shen, Y., Agrawal, A., & Stanton, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13400 · Cited by 15
Fake review detection using machine learning
Kumar, G. K., Mahammad, F. S., Chaitanya, V. L., Moulali, C., Rajasekhar, K., Rangaiah, D. N. L., & ImamVali, D. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0212706 · Cited by 5
Enhancing Fake Review Detection Using Linguistic Exaggeration, BERT Embeddings, and Fuzzy Logic
Ennaouri, M., & Zellou, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3594629 · Cited by 6
Research on Fake Rating Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning
Wang, X., Ji, S., & Liang, Y. (2021) · The 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science · doi:10.1145/3448734.3450818 · Cited by 5
Spatio-Temporal Graph Representation Learning for Fraudster Group Detection
Shehnepoor, S., Togneri, R. B., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3212001 · Cited by 6
Internet Identity Analysis and Similarities Detection
Wilaszek, K., Wójcik, T., Opaliński, A., & Turek, W. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30721-8_36 · Cited by 5
An intelligent spam detection framework using fusion of spammer behavior and linguistic
Iqbal, A., Younas, M., Hanif, M. K., Murad, M. S. H., Saleem, R., & Javed, M. H. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313628 · Cited by 5
Detecting spamming stores by analyzing their suspicious behaviors
Chengzhang, J., & Kang, D.-K. (2015) · International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology · doi:10.1109/icact.2015.7224845 · Cited by 5
Discovering Influential Nodes for Viral Marketing
Li, Y.-M., Lai, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-H. (2009) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2009.163 · Cited by 5
Fine-grained opinion mining of product review using sentiment and semantic orientation
Dubey, G., Rana, A., & Ranjan, J. (2017) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2017.083274 · Cited by 5
Effect of Feature Reduction using Bigram Technique for detection of Forged Reviews
Nandakishor Prabhu, R., & Ashok, A. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) · doi:10.1109/icacci.2018.8554706 · Cited by 5
Jayathunga, D. P., Ranasinghe, R. M. I. S., & Ramashini, M. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68133-3_10 · Cited by 5
Product rating estimation using machine learning
Reddy, N. C. S., Subhashini, V., Rai, D., Sriharsha, Vittal, B., & Ganesh, S. (2021) · International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) · doi:10.1109/icces51350.2021.9489208 · Cited by 5
Assem, S. A., & Alansary, S. (2022) · International Conference on Language Engineering (ESOLEC) · doi:10.1109/esolec54569.2022.10009298 · Cited by 5
What Is the Internet Water Army? A Practical Feature-Based Detection of Large-Scale Fake Reviews
Guo, B., & Jiang, Z. (2023) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/2565020 · Cited by 5
Ajay, K., & Loganayagi, S. (2023) · International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS) · doi:10.1109/icsss58085.2023.10407235 · Cited by 5
What happens when platforms disclose the purchase history associated with product reviews?
Liu, M., Zeng, X., Zhang, C., & Yong, L. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114367 · Cited by 5
Du, W., Li, J., Zhou, J., Lu, Q., & Sun, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2025.2471673 · Cited by 6
Helpfulness-Guided Review Summarization
Xiong, W. (2013) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Jindal, N., & Liu, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Liu, Bing
- Venue
- Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 219
- OpenAlex
- W2047756776
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 77
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- opinion spam, spam detection, product reviews, online reviews, review aggregation, Amazon reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
