The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technical opinionMotivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use
Abstract
research-article Technical opinionMotivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use Author: Ping Zhang Syracuse University Syracuse UniversityView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 51Issue 11November 2008 pp 145–147https://doi.org/10.1145/1400214.1400244Published:01 November 2008Publication History 215citation2,822DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations215Total Downloads2,822Last 12 Months228Last 6 weeks10 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,312
Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6846 · Cited by 3,085
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two-factor model for website design and evaluation
Zhang, P., & von Dran, G. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1039>3.0.co;2-o · Cited by 488
Self-citationThe importance of affective quality
Zhang, P., & Li, N. (2005) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1081992.1081997 · Cited by 231
Self-citationHuman-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems
Te’eni, D., Carey, J. M., & Zhang, P. (2006) · Cited by 201
Self-citation(1977) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218-18
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gibson J.J., 1977, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Reeve J., 2005, Inc.
- Te'eni D., 2007, Inc.
Cited by
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014) · 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.377 · Cited by 5,201
Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts
Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011) · CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1979742.1979575 · Cited by 2,413
Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature
Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.-A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2016.10.002 · Cited by 1,237
A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0212-z · Cited by 1,080
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, P.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 145-147
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W1986755057
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technical opinionMotivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1400214.1400244
- The paper
- Zhang, P. (2008). Technical opinionMotivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1400214.1400244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
