Cited by 51Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaArtificial Intelligence in Games

Tales from the front lines of a large-scale serious game project

Khaled, Rilla, Ingram, Gordon·2012·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Serious games have received much positive attention; correspondingly, many researchers have taken up the challenge of establishing how to best design them. However, the current literature often focuses on best practice design strategies and frameworks. Fine-grained details, contextual descriptions, and organisational factors that are invaluable in helping us to learn from and reflect on project experiences are often overlooked. In this paper, we present five distinct and sometimes competing perspectives that are critical in understanding factors that influence serious game projects: project organisation, technology, domain knowledge, user research, and game design. We explain these perspectives by providing insights from the design and development process of an EU-funded serious game about conflict resolution developed by an interdisciplinary consortium of researchers and industry-based developers. We also point out a set of underlying forces that become evident from viewing the process from different perspectives, to underscore that problems exist in serious game projects and that we should open the conversation about them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2207676.2207688

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khaled, R., & Ingram, G.
Affiliations
  • IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-05-05
Pages
69-78
OpenAlex
W2158930783
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Space (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • FP7 Information and Communication Technologies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
serious games, serious game design, project organization, technological factors, domain knowledge, user research, game design, interdisciplinary collaboration, conflict resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review