Cited by 264Information Systems Theories and ImplementationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesManagement Theory and Practice

Transforming work: collaboration, learning, and design

Open access
Sachs, Patricia·1995·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

In recent years dramatic changes in the world economy have led companies to restructure themselves in order to compete globally.Debates in the academic community about the changing demand for workplace skills with the globalization of the economy are paralleled in the business literature about what it takes to create a productive business (e.g., [8,22,24]).Business goals for such improvements as computer systems, work systems, or learning organizations are heavily influenced by underlying assumptions about how people work and how organizations function.In this article I examine these underlying assumptions and outline their implications for design.I suggest that underlying assumptions rooted in different conceptions of work coexist within an organization and represent different lenses through which people in the organization peer.One such lens, or conception of work, I call an "organizational, explicit" view, the other an "activity-oriented, tacit" view (see Table 1).Each of these perspectives carries different implications for the design of work and technologies.1 An organizational perspective on work is an explicit view and is represented, for example, by sets of defined tasks and operations such as those described in methods and procedures, which fulfill a set of business functions (the work-flow approach reflects this; see [16].)This view of work differs from an activity-oriented approach, which suggests that the range of activities, communication practices, relationships, and coordination it takes to accomplish business functions is complex and continually mediated by 36

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/223248.223258

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanically applying policy through CPOE can expose gaps between organizational goals and actual clinician behavior, prompting workarounds when the system does not fit their work.

    “As a result, rote implementation of policy or procedure can highlight pronounced differences between organizational intention and provider practice, leading to the adoption of system workarounds by clinicians struggling to use a system that does not fully support their work.26”
  • Research on clinical information systems repeatedly finds that CPOE integration fundamentally alters how clinicians coordinate and collaborate in care delivery.

    “one theme consistently emerges: embedding CPOE in healthcare fundamentally changes the way clinicians coordinate their work activities and collaborate to deliver care.[18][19][20][21]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Engestrom, Y. Developmental work research: Reconstructing expertise through expansive learning. In Human Jobs and Com- puter Interfaces, M.I. Nurminen and G.R.S. Weir, Eds. Elsevier BV, North-Holland, 1991, 265--290.
  2. Goodwin, C., and Goodwin, M.J. Formulating lanes: Seeing as a situated activity. In Communication and Cognition at Work, Y. Engestrom and D. Middleton, Eds. Cambridge University Press, NY (forthcoming).
  3. Hirschhorn, L. Beyond Mechanization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.
  4. Reder, S., and Schwab, J. The communicative economy of the workgroup: Multichannel genres of communication. In Pro- ceedings of the CSCW, ACM Press, New York, 1988.
  5. Wynn, E. Perspective, modeling and social reality. Critical Issues, ACM, NY, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachs, P.
Affiliations
NYNEX Science and Technology, 400 Westchester Ave., White Plains, NY
Corresponding author
Sachs, Patricia
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1995-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
36-44
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2086093613
Cited by
264
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
72.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
job design, concept of work, organizational perspective, tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge, work systems, learning organization, globalization, workplace skills, organizational change, technology design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review