Cited by 8,830Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search

Open access
Grover, Lov K.·1996·Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96

Abstract

An unsorted database contains N records, of which just one satisfies a particular property.The problem is to identify that one record.Any classical algorithm, deterministic or probabilistic, will clearly take O (N) steps since on the average it will have to examine a large fraction of the N records.Quantum mechanical systems can do several operations simultaneously due to their wave like properties.This paper gives an O ( JN) step quantum mechanical algorithm for identifying that record.It is within a constant factor of the fastest possible quantum mechanical algorithm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/237814.237866

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 20 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 4
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
11 of 11
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is a unique state that satisfies the condition C(S)=1.

    “Let there be a unique state, say Sv, that satisfies the condition C(SV) = 1, whereas for all other states S, C(S) = 0”
    “The algorithm as discussed here assumes a unique state that satisfies the desired condition.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For any state S, the condition C(S) can be evaluated in unit time.

    “(assume that for any state S, the condition C(S) can be evaluated in unit time)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There does not exist any sorting on the database that would aid selection of the desired item.

    “However, there does not exist any sorting on the database that would aid its selection.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]9. R. Penrose, Shadows of the mind,. Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 348- 388.
  2. [14]14. Yao93J A. Yao, Quantum circuit complexip, Proceedings 34th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1993, pp. 352-361.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 8,792

Metadata

Authors
Grover, L. K.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Grover, Lov K.
Venue
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1996
Pages
212-219
OpenAlex
W2084652510
Cited by
8,830
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 664 · 2025: 1066 · 2024: 896 · 2023: 841 · 2022: 674 · 2021: 655 · 2020: 529 · 2019: 423 · 2018: 288 · 2017: 283 · 2016: 219 · 2015: 221 · 2014: 184 · 2013: 161 · 2012: 158
FWCI
36.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum search, unsorted database search, Grover's algorithm, quantum algorithms, time complexity, quantum parallelism, lower bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-21, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-21 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review