Cited by 33Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

A multimodal fuzzy inference system using a continuous facial expression representation for emotion detection

Soladié, Catherine, Salam, Hanan, Pelachaud, Catherine, Stoiber, Nicolas, Séguier, Renaud·2012·Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction

Abstract

This paper presents a multimodal fuzzy inference system for emotion detection. The system extracts and merges visual, acoustic and context relevant features. The experiments have been performed as part of the AVEC 2012 challenge. Facial expressions play an important role in emotion detection. However, having an automatic system to detect facial emotional expressions on unknown subjects is still a challenging problem. Here, we propose a method that adapts to the morphology of the subject and that is based on an invariant representation of facial expressions. Our method relies on 8 key expressions of emotions of the subject. In our system, each image of a video sequence is defined by its relative position to these 8 expressions. These 8 expressions are synthesized for each subject from plausible distortions learnt on other subjects and transferred on the neutral face of the subject. Expression recognition in a video sequence is performed in this space with a basic intensity-area detector. The emotion is described in the 4 dimensions: valence, arousal, power and expectancy. The results show that the duration of high intensity smile is an expression that is meaningful for continuous valence detection and can also be used to improve arousal detection. The main variations in power and expectancy are given by context data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2388676.2388782

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soladié, C., Salam, H., Pelachaud, C., Stoiber, N., & Séguier, R.
Affiliations
  • Supélec (FR)
  • CNRS - Telecom ParisTech, Paris, France
  • Dynamixyz, Rennes, France
Venue
Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-10-22
Pages
493-500
OpenAlex
W2109624827
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
9.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, fuzzy inference system, facial expression recognition, facial expression synthesis, arousal detection, contextual features, video-based emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review