Cited by 385Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

The first facial expression recognition and analysis challenge

Open access
Valstar, Michel F., Jiang, Bihan, Mehu, Marc, Pantic, Maja, Scherer, Klaus·2011·Face and Gesture 2011

Abstract

Automatic Facial Expression Recognition and Analysis, in particular FACS Action Unit (AU) detection and discrete emotion detection, has been an active topic in computer science for over two decades. Standardisation and comparability has come some way; for instance, there exist a number of commonly used facial expression databases. However, lack of a common evaluation protocol and lack of sufficient details to reproduce the reported individual results make it difficult to compare systems to each other. This in turn hinders the progress of the field. A periodical challenge in Facial Expression Recognition and Analysis would allow this comparison in a fair manner. It would clarify how far the field has come, and would allow us to identify new goals, challenges and targets. In this paper we present the first challenge in automatic recognition of facial expressions to be held during the IEEE conference on Face and Gesture Recognition 2011, in Santa Barbara, California. Two sub-challenges are defined: one on AU detection and another on discrete emotion detection. It outlines the evaluation protocol, the data used, and the results of a baseline method for the two sub-challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg.2011.5771374

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valstar, M. F., Jiang, B., Mehu, M., Pantic, M., & Scherer, K.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Venue
Face and Gesture 2011
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-03
Pages
921-926
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129106196
Cited by
385
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 18
FWCI
54.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H016988/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, facial expression analysis, benchmark challenge, evaluation protocol, facial expression database, reproducibility, baseline method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review