Cited by 783Ethics and Social Impacts of AINames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchDiscrimination and Equality Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discrimination in online ad delivery

Sweeney, Latanya·2013·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertising.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2447976.2447990

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp , v. Public Service Commission of New York. Supreme Court of the United States, 447 U.S. 557 , 1980 . Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp, v. Public Service Commission of New York. Supreme Court of the United States, 447 U.S. 557, 1980.
  2. Google . Google announces first quarter 2011 financial results ; http://investor.google.com/earnings/ 2011 /Q1_google_earnings.html. Google. Google announces first quarter 2011 financial results; http://investor.google.com/earnings/2011/Q1_google_earnings.html.
  3. Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination , National Research Council. Measuring racial discrimination . National Academy Press , Washington, DC , 2004 . Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination, National Research Council. Measuring racial discrimination. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
  4. Sweeney , L. Discrimination in online ad delivery ( 2013 ). ( For de tails, see full technical report at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. Data, including Web pages and ads, archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads). Sweeney, L. Discrimination in online ad delivery (2013). (For details, see full technical report at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. Data, including Web pages and ads, archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads).
  5. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Racism in America and how to combat it . Washington, DC , 1970 . U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Racism in America and how to combat it. Washington, DC, 1970.
  6. WebShot Command Line Server Edition. Version 1.9.1.1; http://www.websitescreenshots.com/. WebShot Command Line Server Edition. Version 1.9.1.1; http://www.websitescreenshots.com/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 783

Metadata

Authors
Sweeney, L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Sweeney, Latanya
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2013-05
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
44-54
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2095932468
Cited by
783
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
63.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-1237235)
  • Google
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
Keywords
online advertising, racial discrimination, algorithmic discrimination, Google AdWords, algorithmic fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review