Usability inspection methods
Open accessAbstract
Usability inspection is the generic name for a set of costeffective ways of evaluating user interfaces to find usability problems.They are fairly informal methods and easy to use.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dashboard interface was designed according to the usability principle of match between system and the real world, as seen in the use of simple, plain, non-complicated grammar.
“Match between system and the real world: This states that the design should communicate in the language of the users. Words, phrases, and concepts that the user is familiar with were used. Also there is adherence to real-world conventions by arranging information in natural and logical order Nielsen [21]. This is seen in the use of simple, plain, and non-complicated grammar across the screen”
From User-Centered/User Experience Uc/Ux Design Thinking Approach for Designing a University Information Management System (2022) · cites this paper as Nielsen [21]
The Empirical section says heuristic evaluation checks whether interface elements follow established usability principles, but it does not describe the ‘match between system and the real world’ principle. Searches for user language, real-world conventions, and simple grammar found no passage addressing those specifics. The paper also does not assess the citing authors’ dashboard. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,533 · see citing works
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533 · see citing works
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620 · see citing works
Self-citationA mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/169059.169166 · Cited by 1,961 · see citing works
Self-citationFinding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics
Nielsen, J. (1994) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/259963.260333 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation
Karat, C.-M., Campbell, R., & Fiegel, T. (1992) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/142750.142873 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Usability engineering at a discount
Nielsen, J. (1989) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationPaper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1990) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationA comparison of user interface evaluation methods
Karat, C.-M. (1994) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Kahn, M., & Prail, A. (1994) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The usability engineering lifecycle
Mayhew, D. J. (1998) · doi:10.1145/286498.286575 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Observing, predicting, and analyzing usability problems
Mack, R. L., & Montaniz, F. (1994) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A com- parison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, April 28 -May 2), 119-124.
- Kahn, M. J., and Prail, A. (1994). Formal usability inspec- tions. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspec- tion Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 141-172.
- of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI' 90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1-5), 235-242.
- Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Sys- tems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, the Nether- lands. 394-401.
- Nielsen, J. (1990). Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33, 10 (October), 109-118.
- Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering life cycle. IEEE Computer 25,3 (March), 12-22.
- Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25-64.
- Nielsen, J. (1994). Scenarios in discount usability engineer- ing. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Scenario Based Design: Envi- sioning Work and Technology. Book under preparation.
- Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.) (1994). Usabili~Inspec- tion Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Nielsen, J., and Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and emptilcal methods compared. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 24-29), 214-221.
- Polsom P., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., and Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evahta- tion of user interfaces. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 36,5, 741-773.
- In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-140.
- Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L., and Casaday, G. (1994). Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 79-104.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research
Hornbæk, K. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002 · Cited by 1,123 · see citing works
User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges
Kujala, S. (2003) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290301782 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
Kushniruk, A. W., & Patel, V. L. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)
Schnall, R., Rojas, M., Bakken, S., Brown, W., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Carry, M., Gelaude, D., Mosley, J. P., & Travers, J. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)
Parmanto, B., Lewis, Jr., Graham, K. M., & Bertolet, M. H. (2016) · International Journal of Telerehabilitation · doi:10.5195/ijt.2016.6196 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Montague, E., Burns, M. N., & Rashidi, P. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3077 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Bardus, M., van Beurden, S. B., Smith, J. R., & Abraham, C. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0359-9 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability
Zhang, J., & Walji, M. F. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Brown, W., Yen, P.-Y., Rojas, M., & Schnall, R. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.001 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions
Blandford, A., Gibbs, J., Newhouse, N., Perski, O., Singh, A., & Murray, E. (2018) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/2055207618770325 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Web evaluation: Heuristic evaluation vs. user testing
Tan, W.-S., Liu, D., & Bishu, R. (2009) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.012 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Baumel, A., & Kane, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11491 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Toward situated interventions for algorithmic equity: lessons from the field
Katell, M., Young, M., Dailey, D., Herman, B., Guetler, V., Tam, A., Bintz, C., Raz, D., & Krafft, P. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372874 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods
Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S., & Masthoff, J. (2010) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-010-9082-4 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Salman, H. M., Wan Ahmad, W. F., & Sulaiman, S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2827358 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Banbury forum consensus statement on the path forward for digital mental health treatment
Mohr, D. C., Azocar, F., Bertagnolli, A., Choudhury, T., Chrisp, P., Frank, R., Harbin, H., Histon, T., Kaysen, D., Nebeker, C., et al. (2021) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000561 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Effective compiler error message enhancement for novice programming students
Becker, B. A., Glanville, G., Iwashima, R., McDonnell, C., Goslin, K., & Mooney, C. (2016) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2016.1225464 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Investigating usability of mobile health applications in Bangladesh
Islam, M. N., Karim, M. M., Inan, T. T., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1033-3 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Gonçalves, R., Rocha, T., Martins, J., Branco, F., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0557-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Evaluation of live human-computer music-making: quantitative and qualitative approaches
Stowell, D., Robertson, A., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Plumbley, M. D. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.05.007 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Investigating the applicability of user models for motion-impaired users
Keates, S., Clarkson, J., & Robinson, P. (2000) · Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies · doi:10.1145/354324.354354 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Flohr, L., Beaudry, S., Johnson, K. T., West, N., Burns, C. M., Ansermino, J. M., Dumont, G. A., Wensley, D., Skippen, P., & Gorges, M. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine · doi:10.1109/jtehm.2018.2812162 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Documenting the accessibility of 100 US bank and finance websites
Wentz, B., Pham, D., Feaser, E., Smith, D., Smith, J., & Wilson, A. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0616-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Nimmolrat, A., Khuwuthyakorn, P., Wientong, P., & Thinnukool, O. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01573-z · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Martínez-Luna, S. C., Hernández Jiménez, M. J., De La Rosa-Gómez, A., Arenas-Landgrave, P., Esquivel Santoveña, E. E., Arzola-Sánchez, C., Alvarez Silva, J., Solis Nicolas, A. M., Colmenero Guadián, A. M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644782 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Machine-Assisted Learning in Highly-Interdisciplinary Media Fields: A Multimedia Guide on Modern Art
Chatzara, E., Kotsakis, R., Tsipas, N., Vrysis, L., & Dimoulas, C. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030198 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Usability and Accessibility in Tele-Rehabilitation Systems
Luis Pérez Medina, J., Acosta-Vargas, P., & Rybarczyk, Y. (2019) · Assistive and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.5772/intechopen.85869 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Babatunde, F. O., MacDermid, J., Grewal, R., Macedo, L., & Szekeres, M. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/17088 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
USERfit Tool. A Tool to Facilitate Design for All
Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Garay, N., & Tomás, J. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36572-9_11 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Usefulness Design Goals of Occupational mHealth Apps for Healthcare Workers.
Yingta, N., Nocera, J. A., Rehman, I. U., & Brew, O. (2021) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2021.22 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Criticmate: Stagewise Human–AI Co-Critique in Single-Screen UI Evaluation
Ko, J., Choi, J., Morales, C., Kim, D., & Ko, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790929 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nielsen, J.
- Corresponding author
- Nielsen, Jakob
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '94
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 413-414
- OpenAlex
- W4239496300
- Cited by
- 2,759
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 172 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 124 · 2012: 94
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- usability inspection, usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, user-centered design, human-computer interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
