Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,430

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

(Leveled) Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Bootstrapping

Brakerski, Zvika, Gentry, Craig, Vaikuntanathan, Vinod·2014·ACM Transactions on Computation Theory

Abstract

We present a novel approach to fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) that dramatically improves performance and bases security on weaker assumptions. A central conceptual contribution in our work is a new way of constructing leveled, fully homomorphic encryption schemes (capable of evaluating arbitrary polynomial-size circuits of a-priori bounded depth), without Gentry’s bootstrapping procedure. Specifically, we offer a choice of FHE schemes based on the learning with error (LWE) or Ring LWE (RLWE) problems that have 2 λ security against known attacks. We construct the following. (1) A leveled FHE scheme that can evaluate depth- L arithmetic circuits (composed of fan-in 2 gates) using O ( λ . L 3) per-gate computation, quasilinear in the security parameter. Security is based on RLWE for an approximation factor exponential in L . This construction does not use the bootstrapping procedure. (2) A leveled FHE scheme that can evaluate depth- L arithmetic circuits (composed of fan-in 2 gates) using O ( λ 2) per-gate computation, which is independent of L . Security is based on RLWE for quasipolynomial factors. This construction uses bootstrapping as an optimization. We obtain similar results for LWE, but with worse performance. All previous (leveled) FHE schemes required a per-gate computation of Ω ( λ 3.5), and all of them relied on subexponential hardness assumptions. We introduce a number of further optimizations to our scheme based on the Ring LWE assumption. As an example, for circuits of large width (e.g., where a constant fraction of levels have width Ω ( λ )), we can reduce the per-gate computation of the bootstrapped version to O ( λ ), independent of L , by batching the bootstrapping operation. At the core of our construction is a new approach for managing the noise in lattice-based ciphertexts, significantly extending the techniques of Brakerski and Vaikuntanathan [2011b].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2633600

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 1,430

Metadata

Authors
Brakerski, Z., Gentry, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
Published
2014-07
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 1942-3454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-3462
OpenAlex
W2177209050
Cited by
1,430
References
32
FWCI
23.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: (Leveled) Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Bootstrapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2633600
The paper
Brakerski, Z., Gentry, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2014). (Leveled) Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Bootstrapping. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory. https://doi.org/10.1145/2633600

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.