The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy
Abstract
Considering the evolving relationship between established companies and their sharing-economy counterparts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725
Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy
Wirtz, J., So, K. K. F., Mody, M. A., Liu, S. Q., & Chun, H. H. (2019) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2018-0369 · Cited by 414
When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies
Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024 · Cited by 330
Wang, C. (., & Jeong, M. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.006 · Cited by 197
Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: implications for sustainability
Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.295 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Cusumano, M. A.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2014-12-23
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-34
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2120326294
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2688487
- The paper
- Cusumano, M. A. (2015). How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2688487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
