Cited by 131Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use

Open access

Profita, Halley, Albaghli, Reem, Findlater, Leah, Jaeger, Paul, Kane, Shaun K.·2016·Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

DOI 10.1145/2858036.2858130

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Wearable computing devices offer new possibilities to increase accessibility and independence for individuals with disabilities. However, the adoption of such devices may be influenced by social factors, and useful devices may not be adopted if they are considered inappropriate to use. While public policy may adapt to support accommodations for assistive technology, emerging technologies may be unfamiliar or unaccepted by bystanders. We surveyed 1200 individuals about the use of a head-mounted display in a public setting, examining how information about the user's disability affected judgments of the social acceptability of the scenario. Our findings reveal that observers considered head-mounted display use more socially acceptable if the device was being used to support a person with a disability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2858036.2858130

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Untitled work
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Wuetherick, B. (2010) · Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education · doi:10.21225/d5g01t · Cited by 8,333
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006
In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions
Shinohara, K., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979044 · Cited by 495
Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1639642.1639663 · Cited by 383 · cited 6×
“These individuals often prefer to use the same devices as everyone else, in part due to a desire to blend in [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Usable gestures for mobile interfaces
Rico, J., & Brewster, S. A. (2010) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753458 · Cited by 376
Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam
Sellen, A. J., Fogg, A., Aitken, M., Hodges, S., Rother, C., & Wood, K. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240636 · Cited by 324
Assistive Technology Use and Stigma
Parette, P., & Scherer, M. (2004) · Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470403900304 · Cited by 272
In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses
Denning, T., Dehlawi, Z., & Kohno, T. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557352 · Cited by 228

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

Amazon Mechanical Turk. Access date: November 24, 2015. http://www.mturk.com/
Google Glass. Access date: November 24, 2015. http://www.google.com/glass/start/
Betsy Isaacson. 2013. 5 places Google Glass has already been banned. The Huffington Post. Access date: November 24, 2015. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/googleglass-banned_n_3039935.html
OrCam. Access date: September 24, 2015. http://www.orcam.com/
SurveyGizmo. Access date: November 24, 2015. http://www.surveygizmo.com/
10.1007/s00779-003-0245--8 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design
Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236348 · Cited by 493
Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration
Mueller, F. F., Lopes, P., Strohmeier, P., Ju, W., Seim, C., Weigel, M., Nanayakkara, S., Obrist, M., Li, Z., Delfa, J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376242 · Cited by 260
A comprehensive overview of smart wearables: The state of the art literature, recent advances, and future challenges
Niknejad, N., Ismail, W., Mardani, A., Liao, H., & Ghani, I. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103529 · Cited by 227
Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design
Hofmann, M., Kasnitz, D., Mankoff, J., & Bennett, C. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3373625.3416996 · Cited by 200
Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design Strategies
Koelle, M., Ananthanarayan, S., & Boll, S. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376162 · Cited by 190
“It’s Complicated”: Negotiating Accessibility and (Mis)Representation in Image Descriptions of Race, Gender, and Disability
Bennett, C. L., Gleason, C., Scheuerman, M. K., Bigham, J. P., Guo, A., & To, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445498 · Cited by 128
Towards a Multisensory Augmented Reality Map for Blind and Low Vision People: a Participatory Design Approach
Albouys-Perrois, J., Laviole, J., Briant, C., & Brock, A. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174203 · Cited by 107
Untitled work
(2020) · doi:10.1145/3386296.3386301 · Cited by 107
SuperpowerGlass
Washington, P. Y., Voss, C., Kline, A., Haber, N., Daniels, J., Fazel, A., De, T., Feinstein, C., Winograd, T. A., & Wall, D. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3130977 · Cited by 107
(In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology
Faucett, H. A., Ringland, K. E., Cullen, A. L. L., & Hayes, G. R. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3132040 · Cited by 110
Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Individuals' Preferences for Wearable and Mobile Sound Awareness Technologies
Findlater, L., Chinh, B., Jain, D., Froehlich, J. E., Kushalnagar, R., & Lin, A. Z. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300276 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
A Face Recognition Application for People with Visual Impairments: Understanding Use Beyond the Lab
Zhao, Y., Wu, S., Reynolds, L., & Azenkot, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173789 · Cited by 84
PrivacEye
Steil, J., Koelle, M., Heuten, W., Boll, S., & Bulling, A. (2019) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/3314111.3319913 · Cited by 79
Beyond LED Status Lights - Design Requirements of Privacy Notices for Body-worn Cameras
Koelle, M., Wolf, K., & Boll, S. (2018) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/3173225.3173234 · Cited by 74
"I can do everything but see!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts
Thieme, A., Bennett, C. L., Morrison, C. P., Cutrell, E. B., & Taylor, A. S. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173777 · Cited by 72
Design of an Augmented Reality Magnification Aid for Low Vision Users
Stearns, L., Findlater, L., & Froehlich, J. E. (2018) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236361 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: a group autoethnography of a virtual summer internship
Mack, K., Das, M., Jain, D., Bragg, D., Tang, J., Begel, A., Beneteau, E., Davis, J. U., Glasser, A., Park, J. S., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3441852.3471199 · Cited by 68
What is the Point of Fairness? Disability, AI and The Complexity of JusticePreprint
Bennett, C. L., & Keyes, O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.01024 · Cited by 66
Wearable Subtitles
Olwal, A., Balke, K., Votintcev, D., Starner, T. E., Conn, P., Chinh, B., & Corda, B. (2020) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3379337.3415817 · Cited by 68
Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students With Disabilities? A Scoping Review
Pierrès, O., Christen, M., Schmitt, F., & Darvishy, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365368 · Cited by 72
Embracing Errors
Abdolrahmani, A., Easley, W., Williams, M., Branham, S. M., & Hurst, A. K. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025528 · Cited by 60
Virtual reality on the go?
Schwind, V., Reinhardt, J., Rzayev, R., Henze, N., & Wolf, K. (2018) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI Adjunct) · doi:10.1145/3236112.3236127 · Cited by 54
Effects of Position and Alignment of Notifications on AR Glasses during Social Interaction
Rzayev, R., Susanne, K., Maul, M., Schark, A., Schwind, V., & Henze, N. (2020) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3419249.3420095 · Cited by 53
Second Version of Google Glass as a Wearable Socio-Affective Aid: Positive School Desirability, High Usability, and Theoretical Framework in a Sample of Children with Autism
Sahin, N. T., Keshav, N. U., Salisbury, J. P., & Vahabzadeh, A. B. N. (2018) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.8785 · Cited by 58
HomeSound: An Iterative Field Deployment of an In-Home Sound Awareness System for Deaf or Hard of Hearing Users
Jain, D., Mack, K., Amrous, A., Wright, M. M., Goodman, S. M., Findlater, L., & Froehlich, J. E. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376758 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Acceptability of Speech and Silent Speech Input Methods in Private and Public
Pandey, L., Hasan, K., & Arif, A. S. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445430 · Cited by 57
Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8 · Cited by 48
“For example, the general public may not accept Google Glass due to privacy concerns, but its use to help people with visual impairments may receive more acceptance (Profita et al., 2016).”
Social acceptability of virtual reality in public spaces
Eghbali, P., Väänänen, K., & Jokela, T. (2019) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3365610.3365647 · Cited by 47
ProCom
Boyd, L. E., Jiang, X., & Hayes, G. R. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3026014 · Cited by 45
Longitudinal Socio-Emotional Learning Intervention for Autism via Smartglasses: Qualitative School Teacher Descriptions of Practicality, Usability, and Efficacy in General and Special Education Classroom Settings
Keshav, N. U., Vahabzadeh, A. B. N., Abdus-Sabur, R., Huey, K., Salisbury, J. P., Liu, R., & Sahin, N. T. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8030107 · Cited by 62
I Can't Be Myself
Alharbi, R., Stump, T. K., Vafaie, N., Pfammatter, A. F., Spring, B. J., & Alshurafa, N. I. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3264900 · Cited by 50
Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind
Lee, K., Sato, D., Asakawa, S., Kacorri, H., & Asakawa, C. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376398 · Cited by 45
Advancements in Smart Wearable Mobility Aids for Visual Impairments: A Bibliometric Narrative Review
Zhang, X., Huang, X., Ding, Y., Long, L., Li, W., & Xu, X. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24247986 · Cited by 51
The Use of Smart Glasses for Lecture Comprehension by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students
Miller, A., Malasig, J., Castro, B., Hanson, V. L., Nicolau, H., & Brandão, A. (2017) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3027063.3053117 · Cited by 41
Influence of Interactivity and Social Environments on User Experience and Social Acceptability in Virtual Reality
Vergari, M., Kojić, T., Vona, F., Garzotto, F., Möller, S., & Voigt‐Antons, J. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr50410.2021.00096 · Cited by 37
Privacy Considerations of the Visually Impaired with Camera Based Assistive Technologies: Misrepresentation, Impropriety, and Fairness
Akter, T., Ahmed, T., Kapadia, A. C., & Swaminathan, S. M. (2020) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3373625.3417003 · Cited by 40
Up to a Limit?
Ahmed, T., Kapadia, A. C., Potluri, V., & Swaminathan, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3264899 · Cited by 35
Technology-Mediated Sight
Zolyomi, A., Shukla, A., & Snyder, J. (2017) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3132525.3132552 · Cited by 38
(Un)Acceptable!?!
Koelle, M., Boll, S., Olsson, T., Williamson, J., Profita, H. P., Kane, S. K., & Mitchell, R. (2018) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3170427.3170620 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Enhancing Blind Visitor’s Autonomy in a Science Museum Using an Autonomous Navigation Robot
Kayukawa, S., Sato, D., Murata, M., Ishihara, T., Takagi, H., Morishima, S., & Asakawa, C. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581220 · Cited by 41
Designing wearable computing technology for acceptability and accessibility
Profita, H. P. (2016) · ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing · doi:10.1145/2904092.2904101 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Exploring the Design Space of AAC Awareness Displays
Sobel, K., Fiannaca, A. J., Campbell, J., Kulkarni, H., Paradiso, A., Cutrell, E., & Morris, M. R. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025610 · Cited by 36
Design in the Public Square
Baldwin, M. S., Hirano, S. H., Mankoff, J. C., & Hayes, G. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359257 · Cited by 36
Understanding the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices using the Stereotype Content Model
Schwind, V., Deierlein, N., Poguntke, R., & Henze, N. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300591 · Cited by 31
Understanding Gesture Input Articulation with Upper-Body Wearables for Users with Upper-Body Motor Impairments
Vatavu, R.-D., & Ungurean, O.-C. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501964 · Cited by 32
Are wearable electronic vision enhancement systems (wEVES) beneficial for people with age‐related macular degeneration? A scoping review
Miller, A., Crossland, M. D., Macnaughton, J., & Latham, K. (2023) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.13117 · Cited by 29
Fairness issues in AI systems that augment sensory abilities
Findlater, L., Goodman, S. M., Zhao, Y., Azenkot, S., & Hanley, M. (2020) · ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing · doi:10.1145/3386296.3386304 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Shared Privacy Concerns of the Visually Impaired and Sighted Bystanders with Camera-Based Assistive Technologies
Akter, T., Ahmed, T., Kapadia, A., & Swaminathan, M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3506857 · Cited by 29
Designing for Independence for People with Visual Impairments
Lee, S., Reddie, M., & Carroll, J. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449223 · Cited by 28
The Wearer, the Device, and Its Use: Advances in Understanding the Social Acceptability of Wearables
Kelly, N., & Gilbert, S. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621237 · Cited by 27
Look, a guidance drone! Assessing the Social Acceptability of Companion Drones for Blind Travelers in Public Spaces
Avila, M., & Funk, M. (2018) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3234695.3241019 · Cited by 27
Exploring Bystanders’ Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes in Jordan
Albayaydh, W. S., & Fléchais, I. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502097 · Cited by 30
How Users, Facility Managers, and Bystanders Perceive and Accept a Navigation Robot for Visually Impaired People in Public Buildings
Kayukawa, S., Sato, D., Murata, M., Ishihara, T., Kosugi, A., Takagi, H., Morishima, S., & Asakawa, C. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900717 · Cited by 26
Understanding the Role Fluidity of Stakeholders During Assistive Technology Research "In the Wild"
Boyd, L. E., Rector, K., Profita, H. P., Stangl, A. J., Zolyomi, A., Kane, S. K., & Hayes, G. R. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025493 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Augmented Reality and Mixed Reality Measurement Under Different Environments: A Survey on Head-Mounted Devices
Guo, H.-J., Bakdash, J. Z., Marusich, L. R., & Prabhakaran, B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3218303 · Cited by 22
Enssat: wearable technology application for the deaf and hard of hearing
Al-Khalifa, S., & Al‐Razgan, M. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-5860-5 · Cited by 22
Investigating Microinteractions for People with Visual Impairments and the Potential Role of On-Body Interaction
Oh, U., Stearns, L., Pradhan, A., Froehlich, J. E., & Findlater, L. (2017) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3132525.3132536 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Social, Cultural and Systematic Frustrations Motivating the Formation of a DIY Hearing Loss Hacking Community
O’Kane, A. A., Aliomar, A., Zheng, R., Schulte, B. F., & Trombetta, G. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300531 · Cited by 19
Evaluating a Wearable Camera's Social Acceptability In-the-Wild
Koelle, M., Wallbaum, T., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312837 · Cited by 19
Playing with Feeling: Exploring Vibrotactile Feedback and Aesthetic Experiences for Developing Haptic Wearables for Blind and Low Vision Music Learning
Lu, L., Kang, J., Crispin, C., & Girouard, A. (2023) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3597638.3608397 · Cited by 18
“Not There Yet”: Feasibility and Challenges of Mobile Sound Recognition to Support Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People
Huang, J. Z., Chhabria, H., & Jain, D. (2023) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3597638.3608431 · Cited by 22
To See and be Seen—Perceived Ethics and Acceptability of Pervasive Augmented Reality
Regenbrecht, H. T., Knott, A., Ferreira, J., & Pantidi, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3366228 · Cited by 22
Breaking Badge: Augmenting Communication with Wearable AAC Smartbadges and Displays
Curtis, H., Lau, Y. H., & Neate, T. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642327 · Cited by 19
Methodological Standards in Accessibility Research on Motor Impairments: A Survey
Sarsenbayeva, Z., van Berkel, N., Velloso, E., Goncalves, J., & Kostakos, V. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3543509 · Cited by 17
The Social Perception of Autonomous Delivery Vehicles Based on the Stereotype Content Model
Pröbster, M., & Marsden, N. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065194 · Cited by 18
Make Interaction Situated: Designing User Acceptable Interaction for Situated Visualization in Public Environments
Zhu, Q., Wang, Z., Zeng, W., Tong, W., Lin, W., & Ma, X. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642049 · Cited by 16
StreetNav: Leveraging Street Cameras to Support Precise Outdoor Navigation for Blind Pedestrians
Jain, G., Hindi, B., Zhang, Z., Srinivasula, K., Xie, M., Ghasemi, M., Weiner, D., Paris, S. A., Xu, X. Y. T., Malcolm, M., et al. (2024) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676333 · Cited by 15
Anticipated User Stereotypes Systematically Affect the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices
Schwind, V., & Henze, N. (2020) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3419249.3420113 · Cited by 13
LiSee: A Headphone that Provides All-day Assistance for Blind and Low-vision Users to Reach Surrounding Objects
Chen, K., Huang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhong, H., Lin, L., Wang, L., & Wu, K. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550282 · Cited by 12
Exploring the User Experience of an AI-based Smartphone Navigation Assistant for People with Visual Impairments
Kuriakose, B., Shrestha, R., & Sandnes, F. E. (2023) · Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly) · doi:10.1145/3605390.3605421 · Cited by 12
Evaluating Display Modalities Using a Mixed Reality Game
Sharma, H. N., Dugas, P. O. T., Dolgov, I., Kerne, A., & Jain, A. (2016) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/2967934.2968090 · Cited by 12
Society's Attitudes Towards Human Augmentation and Performance Enhancement Technologies (SHAPE) Scale
Villa, S., Niess, J., Schmidt, A., & Welsch, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3610915 · Cited by 12
LifeInsight: Design and Evaluation of an AI-Powered Assistive Wearable for Blind and Low Vision People Across Multiple Everyday Life Scenarios
Mathis, F., & Schöning, J. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713486 · Cited by 17
asEars: Designing and Evaluating the User Experience of Wearable Assistive Devices for Single-Sided Deafness
Takaki, K., Nozaki, E., Kanai, T., Hautasaari, A., Kashio, A., Sato, D., Kamogashira, T., Uranaka, T., Urata, S., Koyama, H., et al. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580840 · Cited by 11
Functionality versus Inconspicuousness: Attitudes of People with Low Vision towards OST Smart Glasses
Hoogsteen, K. M. P., Osinga, S., Steenbekkers, B. L. P. A., & Szpiro, S. (2020) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3373625.3418012 · Cited by 12
Uncovering Practical Security and Privacy Threats for Connected Glasses with Embedded Video Cameras
Opaschi, O., & Vatavu, R.-D. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3432700 · Cited by 10
Social Acceptability in Context: Stereotypical Perception of Shape, Body Location, and Usage of Wearable Devices
Sehrt, J., Braams, B., Henze, N., & Schwind, V. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6040100 · Cited by 11
AI and Accessibility: A Discussion of Ethical ConsiderationsPreprint
Morris, M. R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.08939 · Cited by 10
Improving Social Acceptance of Orthopedic Foot Orthoses Through Image-Generative AI in Product Design
Resch, S., Schauer, J., Schwind, V., Völz, D., & Morillo, D. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15084132 · Cited by 10
Educational Opportunities for Immersive Virtual Reality
Ferdig, R. E., Gandolfi, E., & Immel, Z. J. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_66 · Cited by 9
Preferences for Captioning on Emulated Head Worn Displays While in Group Conversation
Britain, G., Martin, D. W., Kwok, T., Sumilong, A., & Starner, T. E. (2022) · ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) · doi:10.1145/3544794.3558468 · Cited by 10
“I can run at night!": Using Augmented Reality to Support Nighttime Guided Running for Low-vision Runners
Abe, Y., Matsushima, K., Hara, K., Sakamoto, D., & Ono, T. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714284 · Cited by 10
Advantage and Misuse of Vision Augmentation – Exploring User Perceptions and Attitudes using a Zoom Prototype
Eghtebas, C., Kiss, F., Koelle, M., & Woźniak, P. W. (2021) · Augmented Humans International Conference (AHs) · doi:10.1145/3458709.3458984 · Cited by 7
Gapeau: Enhancing the Sense of Distance to Others with a Head-Mounted Sensor
Woźniak, M. P., Dominiak, J., Grudzień, K., Wróbel-Lachowska, M., Niess, J., Woźniak, P. W., & Romanowski, A. (2022) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/3490149.3501323 · Cited by 7
AR in TV: Design and Evaluation of Mid-Air Gestures for Moderators to Control Augmented Reality Applications in TV
Samimi, N., von der Au, S., Weidner, F., & Broll, W. (2021) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3490632.3490668 · Cited by 7
Online survey study on social perceptions towards color-changing on-skin displays
You, C.-W., Hung, M.-W., Zhang, X., Huang, P., & Kao, H.-L. (2020) · International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1145/3410531.3414301 · Cited by 7
PrivacEye: Privacy-Preserving First-Person Vision Using Image Features and Eye Movement Analysis
Steil, J., Koelle, M., Heuten, W., Boll, S., & Bulling, A. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 7
Designing Effective Consent Mechanisms for Spontaneous Interactions in Augmented Reality
Windl, M., Laboda, P. Z., & Mayer, S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713519 · Cited by 6
Probing User Perceptions of On-Skin Notification Displays
Kao, H.-L., Hung, M.-W., Zhang, X., Huang, P., & You, C.-W. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432943 · Cited by 6
"I Choose Assistive Devices That Save My Face" A Study on Perceptions of Accessibility and Assistive Technology Use Conducted in ChinaPreprint
Li, F. M., Chen, D. L., Fan, M., & Truong, K. N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.09348 · Cited by 49
Accessing Passersby Proxemic Signals through a Head-Worn Camera: Opportunities and Limitations for the Blind
Lee, K., Sato, D., Asakawa, S., Asakawa, C., & Kacorri, H. (2021) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3441852.3471232 · Cited by 7
Ubiquity of VR: Towards Investigating Ways of Interrupting VR Users to Obtain Their Attention in Public Spaces
Wang, Y., Schimmerl, R. J., Kocur, M., & Wintersberger, P. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48495-7_3 · Cited by 6
Deinstitutionalizing Independence
Storer, K. M., & Branham, S. M. (2021) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3441852.3471213 · Cited by 7
MAPVI
Günther, S., Koutny, R., Dhingra, N., Funk, M., Hirt, C., Miesenberger, K., Mühlhäuser, M., & Kunz, A. M. (2019) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3316782.3322747 · Cited by 6
Educational Opportunities for Immersive Virtual Reality
Ferdig, R. E., Gandolfi, E., & Immel, Z. J. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_66-1 · Cited by 6
Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: A Group Autoethnography of a Virtual Summer Internship
Mack, K., Das, M., Jain, D., Bragg, D., Tang, J. C., Begel, A., Beneteau, E., Davis, J. U., Glasser, A., Park, J.-S., et al. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3604622 · Cited by 6
Ubiquitous Intelligent Cameras—Between Legal Nightmare and Social Empowerment
Koelle, M., Rose, E., & Boll, S. (2019) · IEEE Multimedia · doi:10.1109/mmul.2019.2902922 · Cited by 6
Towards Immersive Mixed Reality Street Play: Understanding Co-located Bodily Play with See-through Head-Mounted Displays in Public Spaces
Hu, B. A., Lin, R. R., Tao, Y. E., Laato, S., & Li, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757679 · Cited by 5
Reading-Assistance Tools Among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Computing Professionals in the U.S.: Their Reading Experiences, Interests and Perceptions of Social Accessibility
Alonzo, O., Elliot, L. B., Dingman, B., Lee, S., Amin, A. A., & Huenerfauth, M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3520198 · Cited by 5
“I Choose Assistive Devices That Save My Face”
Li, F. M., Chen, D. L., Fan, M., & Truong, K. N. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445321 · Cited by 3

Authors: Profita, H., Albaghli, R., Findlater, L., Jaeger, P., & Kane, S. K.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID: Profita, Halley
Albaghli, Reem
Findlater, Leah
Kane, Shaun K.
Venue: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher: ACM
Published: 2016-05-07
Pages: 4884-4895
DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858130
OpenAlex: W2398493637
Cited by: 131
References: 32
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI: 38.38
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders: NSF (IIS-1350438)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords: assistive technology, wearable computing, head-mounted displays, social acceptance, disability, technology adoption, accessibility, public policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks