Cited by 10ICT Impact and PoliciesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourICT in Developing Communities

Imagined Connectivities: Synthesized Conceptions of Public Wi-Fi in Urban India

Open access
Sambasivan, Nithya, Aoki, Paul M.·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

India and other economies in the Global South are undergoing a proliferation in public Wi-Fi, with large-scale deployments from industry and government. In this paper, we report on a qualitative study on public Wi-Fi conceptions as held by urban Indians, textit{a priori} to connecting to a network. Our findings show that prior public Wi-Fi users and non-users alike raised a surprising range and depth of conceptions---ranging from suspicion of operators' intentions to monetize, to concerns about sexual image morphing, to fears of phone wipeouts, to aspiration---which were informed by popular media, BlueTooth cultures, and social learning. We found these conceptions of Wi-Fi networks to significantly influence adoption of public Wi-Fi. With enormous investments in public Wi-Fi initiatives, we call for network providers to address these deep conceptions among emerging users; by suggesting ways to build public awareness, better user experiences, and business model innovation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3025453.3025545

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language can correspond to religion, class, ethnicity, and caste in India, and many AI systems serve in English, which only 10% of Indians understand.

    “• Language: Language can correspond to religion, class, ethnicity, and caste.Many AI systems serve in English, which only 10% of Indians understand [174].”

    From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [174]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Steven J Jackson, Nova Ahmed, and others. 2014. Protibadi: A platform for fighting sexual harassment in urban Bangladesh. In CHI. ACM, 2695-2704.
  2. Arjun Appadurai. 1996. Modernity at Large. Univ. Minnesota Press.
  3. Jill P Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne LaRose, and Amy S Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: The role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In CSCW. 477-490.
  4. Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell. 2007. The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure. Environ. Plan. B 34, 3 (2007), 414-430.
  5. IT. 2008. IT amendment act. . (July 2008). Technology Use Around the Globe CHI 2017, May 6-11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA
  6. Anandam Kavoori and Kalyani Chadha. 2006. The cell phone as a cultural technology: Lessons from the Indian case. In The Cell Phone Reader, Anandam Kavoori and Noah Arceneaux (Eds.). Peter Lang, 227-239.
  7. Scott D Mainwaring, Michele F Chang, and Ken Anderson. 2004. Infrastructures and their discontents. In UbiComp. Springer, 418-432.
  8. Tony Salvador, Genevieve Bell, and Ken Anderson. 1999. Design ethnography. Des. Manage. Rev. 10, 4 (1999), 35-41.
  9. Debra Spitulnik. 2002. Rethinking reception through Zambian radio culture. In Media worlds, Faye D. Ginsburg, Lila Abu-Lughod, and Brian Larkin (Eds.). Univ. Calif. Press, 337-354.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond

    Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445896 · Cited by 228 · see citing works

    “Researchers have pointed to the aspirational role played by technology in India, signifying symbolic meanings of modernity and progress via technocracy [149, 150, 176].”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Authors
Sambasivan, N., & Aoki, P. M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-05-02
Pages
5917-5928
OpenAlex
W2611118925
Cited by
10
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
AHRC Knowledge Exchange Hub for the Creative Economy (AH/J005150/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
public Wi-Fi, technology adoption, urban Indians, Global South, social learning, popular media, business model innovation, public awareness, user experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review