Cited by 236ICT in Developing CommunitiesInnovative Human-Technology InteractionTechnology Use by Older Adults

Intermediated technology use in developing communities

Sambasivan, Nithya, Cutrell, Ed, Toyama, Kentaro, Nardi, Bonnie·2010·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

We describe a prevalent mode of information access in low-income communities of the developing world--intermediated interactions. They enable persons for whom technology is inaccessible due to non-literacy, lack of technology-operation skills, or financial constraints, to benefit from technologies through digitally skilled users--thus, expanding the reach of technologies. Reporting the results of our ethnography in two urban slums of Bangalore, India, we present three distinct intermediated interactions: inputting intent into the device in proximate enabling, interpretation of device output in proximate translation, and both input of intent and interpretation of output in surrogate usage. We present some requirements and challenges in interface design of these interactions and explain how they are different from direct interactions. We then explain the broader effects of these interactions on low-income communities, and present some implications for design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1753326.1753718

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interviewees said the rare recourse available to Indians was frequently culturally insensitive or degrading.

    “Respondents described that when recourse existed, it was often culturally-insensitive or dehumanising, e.g., a respondent was violently questioned about their clothing by staff of a ride-sharing application, during redressal for an assault faced in a taxi (also see [177] for poor recourse).”

    From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [177]

  • In the non-West, unequal standards, weak safeguards, and questionable AI uses can have catastrophic consequences.

    “Similarly, unequal standards, inadequate safeguards, and dubious applications of AI in the non-West can lead to catastrophic effects (similar analogies have been made for content moderation [165,177]).”

    From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [177]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sambasivan, N., Cutrell, E., Toyama, K., & Nardi, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Microsoft Research (India) (IN)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-04-10
Pages
2583-2592
OpenAlex
W2135852677
Cited by
236
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
low-income communities, urban slums, digital divide, access to information, interface design, technology access barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review