The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts
Abstract
The presence construct, most commonly defined as the sense of “being there,” has driven research and development of virtual environments (VEs) for decades. Despite that, there is not widespread agreement on how to define or operationalize this construct. The literature contains many different definitions of presence and many proposed measures for it. This article reviews many of the definitions, measures, and models of presence from the literature. We also review several related constructs, including social presence, copresence, immersion, agency, transportation, reality judgment, and embodiment. In addition, we present a meta-analysis of existing presence models and propose a model of presence informed by Slater’s Place Illusion and Plausibility Illusion constructs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,637
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989
Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474698565686 · Cited by 6,371
Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence
Steuer, J. (1992) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 5,459
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 · Cited by 4,861
Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35784 · Cited by 4,410
At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x · Cited by 3,706
Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1828 · Cited by 3,522
Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 · Cited by 3,189
Cited by
Construction of the Virtual Embodiment Questionnaire (VEQ)
Roth, D., & Latoschik, M. E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2020.3023603 · Cited by 312
Dermody, G., Whitehead, L., Wilson, G., & Glass, C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17331 · Cited by 209
Breaking The Experience: Effects of Questionnaires in VR User Studies
Putze, S., Alexandrovsky, D., Putze, F., Höffner, S., Smeddinck, J. D., & Malaka, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376144 · Cited by 138
Jung, S., & Lindeman, R. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.693327 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., & Whitton, M. C.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2017-11-14
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2770761158
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 131
- FWCI
- 38.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3134301
- The paper
- Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., & Whitton, M. C. (2018). A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.