Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

Open access
Mendling, Jan, Weber, Ingo, Aalst, Wil Van Der, Brocke, Jan Vom, Cabanillas, Cristina, Daniel, Florian, Debois, Søren, Ciccio, Claudio Di, Dumas, Marlon, Dustdar, Schahram, Gal, Avigdor, García-Bañuelos, Luciano, Governatori, Guido, Hull, Richard, Rosa, Marcello La, Leopold, Henrik, Leymann, Frank, Recker, Jan, Reichert, Manfred, Reijers, Hajo A., Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie, Solti, Andreas, Rosemann, Michael, Schulte, Stefan, Singh, Munindar P., Slaats, Tijs, Staples, Mark, Weber, Barbara, Weidlich, Matthias, Weske, Mathias, Xu, Xiwei, Zhu, Liming·2018·ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

Abstract

Blockchain technology offers a sizable promise to rethink the way interorganizational business processes are managed because of its potential to realize execution without a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). To stimulate research on this promise and the limits thereof, in this article, we outline the challenges and opportunities of blockchain for business process management (BPM). We first reflect how blockchains could be used in the context of the established BPM lifecycle and second how they might become relevant beyond. We conclude our discourse with a summary of seven research directions for investigating the application of blockchain technology in the context of BPM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3183367

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 704

Metadata

Authors
Mendling, J., Weber, I., Aalst, W. V. D., Brocke, J. V., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., Debois, S., Ciccio, C. D., Dumas, M., Dustdar, S., Gal, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Governatori, G., Hull, R., Rosa, M. L., Leopold, H., Leymann, F., Recker, J., Reichert, M., Reijers, H. A., Rinderle-Ma, S., Solti, A., Rosemann, M., Schulte, S., Singh, M. P., Slaats, T., Staples, M., Weber, B., Weidlich, M., Weske, M., Xu, X., & Zhu, L.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
Published
2018-02-26
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-6578
OpenAlex
W2606010969
Cited by
704
References
5
FWCI
145.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3183367
The paper
Mendling, J., Weber, I., Aalst, W. V. D., Brocke, J. V., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., Debois, S., Ciccio, C. D., Dumas, M., Dustdar, S., Gal, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Governatori, G., Hull, R., Rosa, M. L., Leopold, H., Leymann, F., Recker, J., Reichert, M., . . . Zhu, L. (2018). Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183367

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.