Cited by 362Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningCryptography and Data Security

A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology

Open access
Prashanth Joshi, Archana, ,Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA, Han, Meng, Wang, Yan·2018·Mathematical Foundations of Computing

Abstract

Blockchain is gaining traction and can be termed as one of the furthermost prevalent topics nowadays. Although critics question about its scalability, security, and sustainability, it has already transformed many individuals' lifestyle in some areas due to its inordinate influence on industries and businesses. Granting that the features of blockchain technology guarantee more reliable and expedient services, it is important to consider the security and privacy issues and challenges behind the innovative technology. The spectrum of blockchain applications range from financial, healthcare, automobile, risk management, Internet of things (IoT) to public and social services. Several studies focus on utilizing the blockchain data structure in various applications. However, a comprehensive survey on technical and applications perspective has not yet been accomplished. In this paper, we try to conduct a comprehensive survey on the blockchain technology by discussing its structure to different consensus algorithms as well as the challenges and opportunities from the prospective of security and privacy of data in blockchains. Furthermore, we delve into future trends the blockchain technology can adapt in the years to come.Index Terms- Blockchains, Future Trends of Blockchains, Security, Privacy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3934/mfc.2018007

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [24][24] A. Kiayias and G. Panagiotakos, Speed-security tradeoffs in blockchain protocols, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , 2015 (2015), 1019.
  2. [29][29] D. Larimer, Transactions as proof-of-stake, 2013.
  3. [33][33] I.-C. Lin and T.-C. Liao , A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges., IJ Network Security , 19 (2017), 653-659.
  4. [34][34] L. A. Linn and M. B. Koo, Blockchain for health data and its potential use in health it and health care related research, in ONC/NIST Use of Blockchain for Healthcare and Research Workshop. Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States: ONC/NIST , 2016.
  5. [35][35] L. Luu, V. Narayanan, K. Baweja, C. Zheng, S. Gilbert and P. Saxena, Scp: A computationally-scalable byzantine consensus protocol for blockchains., IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive , 2015 (2015), 1168.
  6. [38][38] M. Moser, Anonymity of bitcoin transactions.
  7. [41][41] K. Suankaewmanee, D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, S. Sawadsitang, P. Wang and Z. Han, Performance analysis and application of mobile blockchain, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1712.03659 . · arXiv
  8. [47][47] V. Vishumurthy, S. Chandrakumar and E. G. Sirer, Karma: A secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing, in Proceedings of the 2003 Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley CA , 2003.
  9. [50][50] G. Wood , Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger, Ethereum Project Yellow Paper , 151 (2014), 1-32.
  10. [55][55] X. Zheng, Z. Cai and Y. Li, Data linkage in smart iot systems: A consideration from privacy perspective., IEEE Communications Magazine .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prashanth Joshi, A., K. S. U., Han, M., & Wang, Y.
Corresponding author
Han, Meng
Venue
Mathematical Foundations of Computing
Published
2018
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
121-147
ISSN
2577-8838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799719933
Cited by
362
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 7
FWCI
64.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Mathematical Foundations of Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
blockchain, blockchain security, data privacy, consensus algorithms, blockchain architecture, blockchain applications, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review