Cited by 112Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills

Wambsganss, Thiemo, Niklaus, Christina, Cetto, Matthias, Söllner, Matthias, Handschuh, Siegfried, Leimeister, Jan Marco·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) bear the opportunity to analyze the argumentation quality of texts. This can be leveraged to provide students with individual and adaptive feedback in their personal learning journey. To test if individual feedback on students' argumentation will help them to write more convincing texts, we developed AL, an adaptive IT tool that provides students with feedback on the argumentation structure of a given text. We compared AL with 54 students to a proven argumentation support tool. We found students using AL wrote more convincing texts with better formal quality of argumentation compared to the ones using the traditional approach. The measured technology acceptance provided promising results to use this tool as a feedback application in different learning settings. The results suggest that learning applications based on NLP may have a beneficial use for developing better writing and reasoning for students in traditional learning settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3313831.3376732

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wambsganss, T., Niklaus, C., Cetto, M., Söllner, M., Handschuh, S., & Leimeister, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • University of Passau (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-21
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W3028947997
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
argumentation skills, individual feedback, argumentation structure, argumentative writing, technology acceptance, writing instruction, reasoning skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review