Cited by 25Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

Adaptive Empathy Learning Support in Peer Review Scenarios

Wambsganss, Thiemo, Soellner, Matthias, Koedinger, Kenneth R, Leimeister, Jan Marco·2022·CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Advances in Natural Language Processing offer techniques to detect the empathy level in texts. To test if individual feedback on certain students’ empathy level in their peer review writing process will help them to write more empathic reviews, we developed ELEA, an adaptive writing support system that provides students with feedback on the cognitive and emotional empathy structures. We compared ELEA to a proven empathy support tool in a peer review setting with 119 students. We found students using ELEA wrote more empathic peer reviews with a higher level of emotional empathy compared to the control group. The high perceived skill learning, the technology acceptance, and the level of enjoyment provide promising results to use such an approach as a feedback application in traditional learning settings. Our results indicate that learning applications based on NLP are able to foster empathic writing skills of students in peer review scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3491102.3517740

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wambsganss, T., Soellner, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Leimeister, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
  • Information Systems and Systems Engineering, University of Kassel, Germany
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
Venue
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-29
Pages
1-17
OpenAlex
W4225015089
Cited by
24
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (200207)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
empathy detection, peer review, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, writing feedback, Elea, technology acceptance, student enjoyment, natural language processing in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review