Cited by 35Diabetes Management and ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Towards Wearable-based Hypoglycemia Detection and Warning in Diabetes

Open access
Maritsch, Martin, Föll, Simon, Lehmann, Vera, Bérubé, Caterina, Kraus, Mathias, Feuerriegel, Stefan, Kowatsch, Tobias, Züger, Thomas +3 more·2020·Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Rigorous blood glucose management is vital for individuals with diabetes to prevent states of too low blood glucose (hypoglycemia). While there are continuous glucose monitors available, they are expensive and not available for many patients. Related work suggests a correlation between the blood glucose level and physiological measures, such as heart rate variability. We therefore propose a machine learning model to detect hypoglycemia on basis of data from smartwatch sensors gathered in a proof-of-concept study. In further work, we want to integrate our model in wearables and warn individuals with diabetes of possible hypoglycemia. However, presenting just the detection output alone might be confusing to a patient especially if it is a false positive result. We thus use SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values for feature attribution and a method for subsequently explaining the model decision in a comprehensible way on smartwatches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3334480.3382808

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maritsch, M., Föll, S., Lehmann, V., Bérubé, C., Kraus, M., Feuerriegel, S., Kowatsch, T., Züger, T., Stettler, C., Fleisch, E., & Wortmann, F.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-25
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W3006524040
Cited by
35
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
27.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
hypoglycemia detection, diabetes mellitus, wearable sensors, smartwatches, heart rate variability, blood glucose monitoring, machine learning, SHAP, explainable AI, decision explanation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review