Cited by 9Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood Recognition

The quest for raw signals: a quality review of publicly available photoplethysmography datasets

Wolling, Florian, Van Laerhoven, Kristof·2020·Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Data: Acquisition To Analysis

Abstract

Photoplethysmography is an optical measurement principle which is present in most modern wearable devices such as fitness trackers and smartwatches. As the analysis of physiological signals requires reliable but energy-efficient algorithms, suitable datasets are essential for their development, evaluation, and benchmark. A broad variety of clinical datasets is available with recordings from medical pulse oximeters which traditionally apply transmission mode photoplethysmography at the fingertip or earlobe. However, only few publicly available datasets utilize recent reflective mode sensors which are typically worn at the wrist and whose signals show different characteristics. Moreover, the recordings are often advertised as raw, but then turn out to be preprocessed and filtered while the applied parameters are not stated. In this way, the heart rate and its variability can be extracted, but interesting secondary information from the non-stationary signal is often lost. Consequently, the test of novel signal processing approaches for wearable devices usually implies the gathering of own or the use of inappropriate data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3419016.3431485

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is high variance in PPG signal quality across different devices, such that a device-specific consideration seems appropriate.

    “Naturally, the signal quality of PPG data in general is often discussed in other work as it is highly susceptible to motion artifacts57, however, there is also a high variance in PPG signal quality across different devices67, such that a device-specific consideration seems appropriate.”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolling, F., & Van Laerhoven, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Siegen (DE)
  • University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
Venue
Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Data: Acquisition To Analysis
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-11-16
Pages
14-19
OpenAlex
W3097572050
Cited by
9
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Workshop on Data: Acquisition To Analysis (DATA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
photoplethysmography, wearable devices, pulse oximetry, heart rate variability, signal preprocessing, wrist-worn sensors, physiological signal analysis, energy-efficient algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review