Cited by 116Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlECG Monitoring and Analysis

Photoplethysmography sampling frequency: pilot assessment of how low can we go to analyze pulse rate variability with reliability?

Open access
Choi, A, Shin, H·2017·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

Pulse rate variability (PRV) analysis appears as the first alternative to heart rate variability analysis for wearable devices; however, there is a constraint on computational load and energy consumption for the limited system resources available to the devices. Considering that adjustment of the sampling frequency is one of the strategies for reducing computational load and power consumption, this study aimed to investigate the influence of sampling frequency ( f s ) on PRV analysis and to find the minimum sampling frequency while maintaining reliability. We generated 5000, 2500, 1000, 500, 250, 100, 50, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5 Hz down-sampled photoplethysmograms from 10 kHz-sampled PPGs and derived time- and frequency-domain variables of the PRV. These included AVNN, SDNN, SDSD, RMSSD, NN50, pNN50, total power, VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF, nLF and nHF for each down-sampled signal. Derived variables were compared with heart rate variability of the 10 kHz-sampled electrocardiograms, and then statistically investigated using one-way ANOVA test and Bland–Altman analysis. As a result, significant differences ( P < 0.05) were found for SDNN, SDSD, RMSSD, NN50, pNN50, TP, HF, LF/HF, nLF and nHF, but not for AVNN, VLF and LF. Based on the post hoc tests, it was found that the NN50 and pNN50, SDSD and RMSSD, LF/HF and nHF, SDNN, TP and nLF analysis had significant differences at f s ⩽ 20 Hz, f s ⩽ 15 Hz, f s ⩽10 Hz; f s = 5 Hz, respectively. In other words, a significant difference was not seen for any variable if the f s was greater than 25 Hz. Consequently, our pilot study suggests that analysis of variability in the time and frequency domain from pulse rate obtained through PPG may be potentially as reliable as that derived from the analysis of the electrocardiogram, provided that f s ⩾25 Hz sampling frequency is used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6579/aa5efa

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, A., & Shin, H.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Chonnam National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Choi, A
  • Shin, H
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
586-600
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2586184806
Cited by
116
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2015R1C1A1A02036535)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
photoplethysmography, pulse rate variability, sampling frequency, downsampling, wearable devices, heart rate variability, signal reliability, power consumption, computational load, time and frequency domain analysis, electrocardiogram comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Photoplethysmography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review