Cited by 57Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

CorpusBrain: Pre-train a Generative Retrieval Model for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks

Open access
Chen, Jiangui, Zhang, Ruqing, Guo, Jiafeng, Liu, Yiqun, Fan, Yixing, Cheng, Xueqi·2022·Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Abstract

Knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILT) usually require a large body of information to provide correct answers. A popular paradigm to solve this problem is to combine a search system with a machine reader, where the former retrieves supporting evidences and the latter examines them to produce answers. Recently, the reader component has witnessed significant advances with the help of large-scale pre-trained generative models. Meanwhile most existing solutions in the search component rely on the traditional "index-retrieve-then-rank'' pipeline, which suffers from large memory footprint and difficulty in end-to-end optimization. Inspired by recent efforts in constructing model-based IR models, we propose to replace the traditional multi-step search pipeline with a novel single-step generative model, which can dramatically simplify the search process and be optimized in an end-to-end manner. We show that a strong generative retrieval model can be learned with a set of adequately designed pre-training tasks, and be adopted to improve a variety of downstream KILT tasks with further fine-tuning. We name the pre-trained generative retrieval model as CorpusBrain as all information about the corpus is encoded in its parameters without the need of constructing additional index. Empirical results show that CorpusBrain can significantly outperform strong baselines for the retrieval task on the KILT benchmark and establish new state-of-the-art downstream performances. We also show that CorpusBrain works well under zero- and low-resource settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3511808.3557271

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]3. Christopher Burges, Robert Ragno, and Quoc Le. 2006. Learning to rank with nonsmooth cost functions. NIPS 19 (2006).
  2. [4]4. Wei-Cheng Chang, X Yu Felix, Yin-Wen Chang, Yiming Yang, and Sanjiv Kumar. 2019. Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrieval. In ICLR.
  3. [9]9. Nicola De Cao, Gautier Izacard, Sebastian Riedel, and Fabio Petroni. 2020. Au- toregressive Entity Retrieval. In ICLR.
  4. [11]11. Hady Elsahar, Pavlos Vougiouklis, Arslen Remaci, Christophe Gravier, Jonathon Hare, Frederique Laforest, and Elena Simperl. 2018. T-rex: A large scale alignment of natural language with knowledge base triples. In LREC.
  5. [35]35. Zhengyi Ma, Zhicheng Dou, Wei Xu, Xinyu Zhang, Hao Jiang, Zhao Cao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2021. Pre-training for Ad-hoc Retrieval: Hyperlink is Also You Need. In CIKM. 1212-1221.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Computing Technology (CN)
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-10-17
Pages
191-200
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292215729
Cited by
57
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62006218, 61902381)
  • the Lenovo-CAS Joint Lab Youth Scientist Project
  • the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (20144310, 2021100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
generative retrieval, pre-training, end-to-end optimization, machine reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review