Cited by 13Topic ModelingSemantic Web and OntologiesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

COSMO: A Large-Scale E-commerce Common Sense Knowledge Generation and Serving System at Amazon

Yu, Changlong, Liu, Xin, Maia, Jefferson, Li, Yang, Cao, Tianyu, Gao, Yifan, Song, Yangqiu, Goutam, Rahul +3 more·2024·Companion of the 2024 International Conference on Management of Data

Abstract

Applications of large-scale knowledge graphs in the e-commerce platforms can improve shopping experience for their customers. While existing e-commerce knowledge graphs (KGs) integrate a large volume of concepts or product attributes, they fail to discover user intentions, leaving the gap with how people think, behave, and interact with the surrounding world. In this work, we present COSMO, a scalable system to mine user-centric commonsense knowledge from massive behaviors and construct industry-scale knowledge graphs to empower diverse online services. In particular, we describe a pipeline for collecting high-quality seed knowledge assertions that are distilled from large language models (LLMs) and further refined by critic classifiers trained over human-in-the-loop annotated data.Since those generations may not always align with human preferences and contain noises, we then describe how we adopt instruction tuning to finetune an efficient language model~(COSMO-LM) for faithful e-commerce commonsense knowledge generation at scale. COSMO-LM effectively expands our knowledge graph to 18 major categories at Amazon, producing millions of high-quality knowledge with only 30k annotated instructions. Finally COSMO has been deployed in Amazon search applications such as search navigation. Both offline and online A/B experiments demonstrate our proposed system achieves significant improvement. Furthermore, these experiments highlight the immense potential of commonsense knowledge extracted from instruction-finetuned large language models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3626246.3653398

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, et al. 2022. Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073 (2022). · arXiv
  2. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. NeurIPS (2020), 1877--1901.
  3. Pengcheng He Xiaodong Liu Jianfeng Gao and Weizhu Chen. 2021. DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention. In ICLR.
  4. Balázs Hidasi Alexandros Karatzoglou Linas Baltrunas and Domonkos Tikk. 2016. Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networks. In ICLR.
  5. Jie Huang, Yifan Gao, Zheng Li, Jingfeng Yang, Yangqiu Song, Chao Zhang, Zining Zhu, Haoming Jiang, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, and Bing Yin. 2023. Ccgen: Explainable complementary concept generation in e-commerce. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11480 (2023). · arXiv
  6. Wei Jin Haitao Mao Zheng Li Haoming Jiang Chen Luo Hongzhi Wen Haoyu Han Hanqing Lu Zhengyang Wang Ruirui Li et al. 2024. Amazon-m2: A multilingual multi-locale shopping session dataset for recommendation and text generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024).
  7. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, et al. 2021. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332 (2021). · arXiv
  8. Jianmo Ni Jiacheng Li and Julian McAuley. 2019. Justifying Recommendations using Distantly-Labeled Reviews and Fine-Grained Aspects. In EMNLP. 188--197.
  9. Baolin Peng, Chunyuan Li, Pengcheng He, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2023. Instruction tuning with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277 (2023). · arXiv
  10. Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Scao, Arun Raja, et al. 2022. Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  11. Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Atomic: An atlas of machine commonsense for if-then reasoning. In the AAAI. 3027--3035.
  12. William Saunders, Catherine Yeh, Jeff Wu, Steven Bills, Long Ouyang, Jonathan Ward, and Jan Leike. 2022. Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05802 (2022). · arXiv
  13. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023). · arXiv
  14. Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, AndrewMDai, and Quoc V Le. 2021. Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot Learners. In ICLR.
  15. Peter West, Chandra Bhagavatula, Jack Hessel, Jena Hwang, Liwei Jiang, Ronan Le Bras, Ximing Lu, Sean Welleck, and Yejin Choi. 2022. Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Models. In NAACL. 4602--4625.
  16. Fanyou Wu, Yang Liu, Rado Gazo, Benes Bedrich, and Xiaobo Qu. 2022. Some Practice for Improving the Search Results of E-commerce. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.00108 (2022). · arXiv
  17. Changlong Yu, Weiqi Wang, Xin Liu, Jiaxin Bai, Yangqiu Song, Zheng Li, Yifan Gao, Tianyu Cao, and Bing Yin. 2023. FolkScope: Intention Knowledge Graph Construction for Discovering E-commerce Commonsense. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023.
  18. Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, et al. 2022. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv:2205.01068 (2022). · arXiv

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Yu, C., Liu, X., Maia, J., Li, Y., Cao, T., Gao, Y., Song, Y., Goutam, R., Zhang, H., Yin, B., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Companion of the 2024 International Conference on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-06-09
Pages
148-160
ISSN
0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398233570
Cited by
13
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
large language models, instruction tuning, human-in-the-loop annotation, knowledge graph construction, Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review